From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Moving kbd to subr.el Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 16:25:30 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20211004081724.6281.11798@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87wnmd13ny.fsf@gnus.org> <87sfx10xs6.fsf@gnus.org> <87h7dfpjn3.fsf@gnus.org> <31b2f1e94178d73e5f05@heytings.org> <87czo3pgs1.fsf@gnus.org> <31b2f1e9412d60db82df@heytings.org> <87o87moopl.fsf@gnus.org> <19fca5d18b63e6eff5de@heytings.org> <87wnmaiida.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgr6gw9s.fsf@gnus.org> <87r1chhhkh.fsf@gnus.org> <871r4hf83m.fsf@gnus.org> <87fssxds6n.fsf@gnus.org> <877de9drqj.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29981"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Gregory Heytings , Stefan Monnier , Emacs developers To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 19 16:54:39 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mcqVi-0007d4-Kp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 16:54:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57658 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mcqVh-0002AX-Du for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 10:54:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38832) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mcq3r-00072t-Ca for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 10:25:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pf1-f181.google.com ([209.85.210.181]:34304) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mcq3k-00034S-Bv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 10:25:47 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pf1-f181.google.com with SMTP id d5so78828pfu.1 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 07:25:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Qxfp5xHXu+eXZJFikPTkWwO+8Te9PxwmQbDNQDTIGpo=; b=eQw2Rj0317tWBIxlQfoYhMI5EiEy/q/KfiUMlY6EnBeO4WElPz+enwROc5vsI0uERD 13/Xb70P+kKHgPMST5eIV3eY7l9AMH+yci/zQpQ2GqTsrPJOBUkUuDluxXTkFoFVUg7h QDmJttSq4In28PC5lTFYJqOpIbbmzBwVOvxbFhQL8hRq5Fch1Qd140hT37OiEiyzIMyA BcFia7FWfETNQFvaJSS4ULSOG1/Ti+d6CVCG0bN4CVc7LwU7LsX4boWNFzbJlaeEmS9g XutwlMihonenaOCj8ucqArDneZ9S9dFsFjXfyaGRagzzP5wuGp3gKLIPZ+p5JnSNCApm MmbQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533NaL+IGBozKnoDOFKP68qMIRYvm03+6ylQGV/vo7h/632Quu74 fXJl2wJ3Fxn/HqUtzVW9GpFQVCHA1r79ntGezw1UtMjEwrU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyPq1lbiTooJP8Fp3zZvMZJWp3JeoIilbqdKKO+jhnMOX/tUA7SOply0CIFjxwQJqnsvAca9K1IUtZWm6Idqh8= X-Received: by 2002:a63:9d06:: with SMTP id i6mr29078955pgd.42.1634653542798; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 07:25:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <877de9drqj.fsf@gnus.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.210.181; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-pf1-f181.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.248, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:277376 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Hm... "key" would also work. It's perhaps more ambiguous, though. What ambiguity do you see? I end up with something like this: > key-define-map > key-define > key-global-set > key-global-unset > key-local-set > key-local-unset > key-lookup (Note that I prefer "global/local" before "set/unset", but the other way around is fine too.)