From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: NonGNU ELPA Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2020 09:47:41 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87ima56h1a.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29760"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Emacs developers , Amin Bandali , Stefan Monnier , Richard Stallman To: Jean Louis Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 28 09:49:18 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kivuv-0007eE-2m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 09:49:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55972 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kivuu-00065M-4V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 03:49:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49002) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kivtf-0005LE-4i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 03:47:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ej1-x62b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::62b]:46326) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kivtd-0004oY-AP; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 03:47:58 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ej1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id bo9so10802174ejb.13; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 00:47:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=gz4OfoBZDnsP+9NI/EXaVCwq0kHP9jDvyZwtQYhdVF8=; b=KL733GZ8mr7uY0H/4C9vZIP1LNFMMWoagyhW1rlcKV7m4wsb+fEp3bYlqpr96NSOGz 38TYPODa2praTSy5oS5y0NcVXGI10hbJ3KOUCFIY4pvOAQj5onnjbBaRlahqUQ5Sv04O /Lwx/KFX399dxlda1was7o/I1kamo/u5Uw4032icLs7Vn+FCaH2GQTHsK/cQsGJQMgLN b364fy0wQ2znGIsUg1LkyLKMZQTkINMC4dyMs1sOqDPA9GI5geyqCPr6XYHzfmcTQAhV j5pCU2n/ArdIIieGMqt8LM9s0wt1gV3glQZqHC4+k+rKjv+qpJrfgpJhZokcKWLDkVzP farw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gz4OfoBZDnsP+9NI/EXaVCwq0kHP9jDvyZwtQYhdVF8=; b=nmU43PfV6RJ6kVlNhLNVMZ6nbBocB4+kUqhvm/WfigOeOEmpllyoGfUK2EVvu/4nHG umYO9jfIm83epMwoDEZJwt8RowuHWQ+S6+yVIk3TFfNZfZYv8qRadyQPFAPF+38aqWZL SamRTgZNSeotyFYM8k+RvE8sExi7NO3RvL3ges7lvMrJFMMSUG7Z7NbmufwyyV/Wj5rr ZTvW9MWIzcTFuW7+PjR3/FAADC0juTkh7B9xQ7W/64IvwIi0xK7261VoBeyvC7MjCJh9 L0AakNeE2nZhJHsRKa2758tfTcZYtkPt3aUdFPb5YUNOiWkAWxoqn4PGqkXvXsPQlaSE FVrA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533P1toN1qTHPvIHmTuRbZ+pfk2aXG4zNJ/czoj5X9nsYjl2o6n+ zA5Vb1ghsdDCex9WLluzixNIqdn+VOYNw0WXWxFBrt+8 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyQIYZUjluPCOBdPFhcY8gTiZJWYMrWA+P3qS1A2OmOnFJNCfblhpRSZRlnnwaWENPP9U38MU7HnkgxKMUDYuo= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:8058:: with SMTP id x24mr12473508ejw.272.1606553273329; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 00:47:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::62b; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-ej1-x62b.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:259939 Archived-At: Jean Louis writes: > > > I may have just few thoughts on README.org and I know it is in > > > progress to be polished. > > > > A patch would be greatly appreciated, yes, > > I would gladly, I am not sure if it is appropriate at this moment > yet as I do not know about agreements between people on how it should > all look like. A patch is appropriate at this time, yes. It will help us make the necessary changes and find any points of contention as well. FWIW, I think all your proposals sound basically good and I don't expect they should be very controversial. Perhaps we would need to adapt this or that detail, but that is done as a matter of course with any patch.