From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#58671: gui-backend-set-selection causing segfault on Debian 12 Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 12:01:41 -0800 Message-ID: References: <83k04twvso.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmeltyvv.fsf@secretsauce.net> <87mt9p5s93.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15478"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: German Pacenza , Eli Zaretskii , 58671@debbugs.gnu.org, Dima Kogan , Geoffrey Ferrari To: Po Lu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 24 21:03:53 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oyIRt-0003ue-AD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 21:03:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oyIQI-0000HX-GN; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 15:02:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oyIQ6-0000Dr-MC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 15:02:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oyIQ6-00068f-D3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 15:02:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oyIQ6-0003u9-5q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 15:02:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 20:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 58671 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 58671-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B58671.166932011314966 (code B ref 58671); Thu, 24 Nov 2022 20:02:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 58671) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Nov 2022 20:01:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60336 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oyIPx-0003tI-0t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 15:01:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-oa1-f49.google.com ([209.85.160.49]:45995) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oyIPr-0003sO-Jl for 58671@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 15:01:48 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-oa1-f49.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-1432a5f6468so2946434fac.12 for <58671@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 12:01:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Y8puxCwPuO3fJjCOw2vkAPweJ/K5AAs+lNpSmA5rtJU=; b=S0XrZmOHopsDaIpfBqkufAvvxFuDhq0DjP3mY2SUhmtJfElgMNByhnic2gB0PNE+/d os+attYM5M+Ot0BB5jVA/DypzrDHHKt8pS5ZT95tZaEeKUhwP20UUAbBN5+FOyEMVrVJ G+ybwQXa+E8zqFmUKH05xyzDIUovTSK5S4MckkEiwIoe+X73f56RFKyT/ZKzePExkxhj 4cvpECy/4cBNUCDhJpXn+9Xl0cvQwJHdo0QhEQNwU4JZKVkh+vvtE/mml0B1i8NCJZFu zcActaU0gcvZEmvXu3e16FPjmqlv0P2AvGtqnhM+R0VWZaE2ouYBlowXMPxodgAiM05/ D9yQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Y8puxCwPuO3fJjCOw2vkAPweJ/K5AAs+lNpSmA5rtJU=; b=2/B65Hqyw9iWWYmPvFnvSxru90AnSEkPE3vqt69gsddu4ixLcKTBOkce5Fil2doGPK oWqs2A6YuqJ8PzXZ9mP554gGdmf7vC/gnovRRJKp8tjyFf45a6PH8KGpVQ5+gxReXSsT GYOG4nW6tJchjkT2W42zUSwFL39B0Nc6wVTyWOIhYOtgjWMg58YUCqvIsPzwIb6C+g+O lLy8tH68lIOWhAap+zILJ12V//v2F6FRnksDeQtgjx18NHGn6pAQuL7//9GMD79ybD1m gAXl3VElvxD3X0QOD2Lc0vW7NtlRGDXgyCIksVLAzvFpcp+e4lsbHt6yt852vpqugh+l Vf4g== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pmXoD9bQwUw6jmhTSRsRvRJYGeySn1MsPm6xoaBXc4dAtsbu+v3 6r1G4XXoErOGkS/n4F985qLXEERPsHdQk1eC7S0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5zWRwpOOF8H2R2T5PlSYNjOgtYKnq7azpMfwk/ZZMMSKGGQw3fKDfC7/RnMf5L1wyGUR447lSNVmGnBx3Lm4o= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:4995:b0:143:522a:ebcc with SMTP id ho21-20020a056870499500b00143522aebccmr2367392oab.199.1669320102010; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 12:01:42 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 12:01:41 -0800 In-Reply-To: <87mt9p5s93.fsf@yahoo.com> (Po Lu's message of "Fri, 21 Oct 2022 19:30:00 +0800") X-Hashcash: 1:20:221124:58671@debbugs.gnu.org::Yx5yksd2tTnWvGG0:7uFb X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:248916 Archived-At: tags 58671 + moreinfo thanks Po Lu writes: >>> It's eff4a4f49a7. Without the 'g'. >>> >>> commit eff4a4f49a7c45df9d27f0515c07d8e8727d84bb >>> Author: Stefan Kangas >>> Date: Mon Oct 17 15:26:56 2022 +0200 >>> >>> Improve native-compile-prune-cache messages >>> >>> * lisp/emacs-lisp/comp.el (native-compile-prune-cache): Quote name of >>> pruned directory. >>> >> >> And this is probably the fix: >> >> commit 0dbd1dbe7d82331f3fda9a0d0b29373149fa7ce5 >> Author: Po Lu >> Date: Tue Oct 18 08:52:01 2022 +0800 >> >> Fix bug#58584 >> >> * src/xterm.c (x_handle_selection_monitor_event): Return if >> selection event is one Emacs asked for. >> (handle_one_xevent): In that case, drop the event and don't let >> it reach GTK. > > Yes, I already asked if that was it. But I think the mail didn't reach > its intended recipients. So was this fixed already?