From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Entering emojis Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 09:27:01 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87cznths5j.fsf@gnus.org> <87ee87cwju.fsf@gnus.org> <83sfwmwubd.fsf@gnu.org> <875ytid54b.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgqu78r2.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10325"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 27 19:06:43 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mfmNv-0002SF-1v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 19:06:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41122 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mfmNt-0004cw-MR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 13:06:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52080) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mfllb-0001zU-2m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 12:27:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pf1-f169.google.com ([209.85.210.169]:35334) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mfllY-0001Pa-Qm; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 12:27:06 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pf1-f169.google.com with SMTP id l203so3232990pfd.2; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 09:27:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=N4O+YmyV0VBpMRFtIm+3+nCS6PsjueGJH1hkTLAU9gQ=; b=PI4cYG8Dy9NOuDg5guemO29wMmJVmR23e5F91itoLoQcp6hB4CEZQJHxaSoApt6IPH l0ZP33KZNDSqyyVe1ArL5cN9yLLg7TtFnaH5hiFbu7DmvSgT3RxDpPA+cMvREb+IQhVa B5tMmB/LFeRB+5mjnB8Dj0yAjCczODUziPDJDpypi69OuaYz1DURcWL5kiwkXCAtjrM5 s1ZVmH7gvOrIjaPKlW2bEcSFrzn/lnlc/rojMehzvkIztxKuUsBg7SevsJjtAmlSLi/w Q8FMDDAzINi9BxgoOJUAxIN/9nuDacE2HyJTXU/ycHbrUwCUPjcZ9qd+JhgyWVTxKSpH XDWg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532pg6/qHEhKfvUJyVlk+1VtMmx0bBAenCyb39msYXsNhUWhjtdR 5bcl+zotqe5FFqnN1HrlhWXseaoCZJMGPA4+pdw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyqf3nVzM1tL10FwnCQSZ8Pbtv0jN6STxxbCaQ6fy0xRJFY3IImr5xNIbfnWNGwg3MXzQVrRDzQZ7hgKlL7SEs= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:1955:b0:47c:1d32:84de with SMTP id s21-20020a056a00195500b0047c1d3284demr8828985pfk.70.1635352022281; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 09:27:02 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 09:27:01 -0700 In-Reply-To: <87zgqu78r2.fsf@gnus.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.210.169; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-pf1-f169.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:278009 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > But I'm thinking that I'd rather this go to master than to emacs-28. > Sure, it's self contained, but I'm absolutely confident that there's a > mass of bugs in the code (since it's 526 lines of brand new code, > statistically speaking there should be at least 53 serious bugs in it). > > So including it in emacs-28 is likely to make the Emacs 28.1 release be > pushed back. How about just adding to NEWS (and maybe elsewhere): "emoji.el is included as an experimental package, use at your own risk and report bugs to ... A stable version of this package will almost certainly be included in Emacs 29.1." Or is that very ugly/bad?