Re: use-package has been merged into emacs-29

[Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com>]

Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> writes:

> That does make sense, but I believe to have had found instances where
> this was not the case.  I'll try and see if I can locate those again.

That will be appreciated, thanks.

> Also, this ties into the other point about the usage of @file.
> Shouldn't the first case be wrapped in @file?

I don't think we do that elsewhere, do we?  See e.g. eshell.texi or
eglot.texi.

My understanding is that it's "use-package" when referring to the
package as a whole, "@file{use-package}" when referring to the library
(i.e. use-package.el), and "@code{use-package}" when referring to the
macro by that name.