From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#65852: 30.0.50; image-auto-resize :type has choices in wrong order Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2023 07:24:52 -0700 Message-ID: References: <081b5bd0-9652-cb7b-3c59-b07cab5e104d@gmail.com> <6fe31ce5-4be7-7f79-e310-52e04d869467@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26659"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= To: Mauro Aranda , 65852@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 10 16:26:27 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qfLON-0006hT-B6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 10 Sep 2023 16:26:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qfLNw-00077L-Ri; Sun, 10 Sep 2023 10:26:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qfLNv-00076y-33 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Sep 2023 10:25:59 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qfLNu-0002a5-RV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Sep 2023 10:25:58 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qfLNy-0002vl-9B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Sep 2023 10:26:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2023 14:26:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 65852 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 65852-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B65852.169435590611201 (code B ref 65852); Sun, 10 Sep 2023 14:26:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 65852) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Sep 2023 14:25:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51059 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qfLN4-0002ua-Eh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Sep 2023 10:25:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lf1-x130.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::130]:51572) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qfLN1-0002ty-Em for 65852@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Sep 2023 10:25:05 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lf1-x130.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-50079d148aeso6023433e87.3 for <65852@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 10 Sep 2023 07:24:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1694355893; x=1694960693; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=rmdwouE18ZpZs5RbxNPc+nbvLT1SrODb8qf3N2Xm288=; b=LkvmX/x7jVZsFY1t1y//3k1Qgh73IObhp92q9IhI/KGywnHiPcg6lulI7SRCM3ljn8 V/gmNuuNhffTHX2Oeq749HGX1LjpZcS+6m4ZK4I+FvbqU2opN5Ca6p1AQbHMpJLu3ebp LrY5vJASclLiPSCO154AMHviIzNmDHqCpUagVb4WX4tQm+HJBmgHJ2jQ8KiK6XoU6dc6 u84vVlsujrTafRD0vplZloI5p9xdYnebKbPgCsUF76yZA7UojhUh522LWZfjtMLROC5o 3PNjoDxoB6t20fSU51QBPYPCu5F+Lq9sJL1KimOM1OCguJ6qfOuFR18Y5TRlV2bxVrol XFHg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1694355893; x=1694960693; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=rmdwouE18ZpZs5RbxNPc+nbvLT1SrODb8qf3N2Xm288=; b=vgG62h2cXZQIvuRglo/5F9GL7lFVEQSBc2PcS1mirerd///mAJFRVW2/7sh/J10VTO XZ7RuTW4P297w1f+BifpcqQuPHkJRSh0S6RCrWkDFXQ9uUlaX1dsWQw9ei0hQeCXiOka AjscIhVtVeCZvY24FUlXCl4jhIvHC7741wpeaU2ZQzOR2GJv9CoTXiGj9N3kxgPxJRGC KYUaT06hpD8DywTzxWZymhRbsPzXihlmnI5ogMiQgmEefukBQxWSh5rvfhkseoqLXRaW jjTBQUMbWJ9JZRbuXLA2dixiIoitaSc+Uy4HayRtfGNpWuIkZw9aO3rwjHCFEGJbxsD1 i0Jg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwPE3ovWHOPs2hU0KkoFFCITJrNIM8i6L6H9yj8Io0IlPln77Bz mpjNWRRNVfDPLI8Oai3BpsSPXY8KzmorxHGAl1Q= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG9HQy58vzuqH0fOJ82bfBt/FQltYUy8pH2m4k11kGgAFgvoXDh2RI24WGNTqmf63nvwUlLEoEDBNC/VsbxITc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:e9c:b0:4fb:bef0:948e with SMTP id bi28-20020a0565120e9c00b004fbbef0948emr6660466lfb.5.1694355893218; Sun, 10 Sep 2023 07:24:53 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sun, 10 Sep 2023 07:24:52 -0700 In-Reply-To: <6fe31ce5-4be7-7f79-e310-52e04d869467@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:269966 Archived-At: Mauro Aranda writes: > I was waiting to get a bug number assigned, so I could add it in the > commit message.=C2=A0 I don't know if there's any other way to do it. That's the only way to do it, as far as I know. Thanks for doing that, because it does save us time when installing patches. I guess it was me that was a bit quick here. > I worked on something like that for elint.el, based on the wishlist on > Bug#2591: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D2591 > > But I know it might be better to make it so that the byte-compiler > warns, so I never posted it. I'm not sure if elint.el is used all that much, but I might be wrong. Mattias, do you think it would make sense to add some warnings for defcustom types to the byte-compiler? If so, I guess we'd want to limit ourselves to flagging obvious errors.