From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Org-mode bugs in the Emacs bug tracker (was: Re: bug archiving policy) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 07:45:08 -0600 Message-ID: References: <20201206092641.xv5gkqcwbpc5gau7@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87o8j1537q.fsf@bzg.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16483"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Boruch Baum , Emacs-Devel List To: Bastien Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 10 14:47:11 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1knMHn-0004A0-D6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 14:47:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58928 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1knMHm-0000mo-Dp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 08:47:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50056) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1knMFx-0007sZ-QL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 08:45:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pf1-f180.google.com ([209.85.210.180]:38765) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1knMFs-0001As-6L; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 08:45:15 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pf1-f180.google.com with SMTP id d2so4115806pfq.5; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 05:45:09 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=WibvZGafq2ydDK57J5RRPP4d6lO2L7QYAljaw5bdFKg=; b=EMuqkN9CRgKBtMcIhO8TxHC0TSXun9VSJI3hfJbCYtGUyM66d8cZcgICF1slnPx37O IRVVIqTtwmIPW2wZVQ15E28WAv9f3hZkEhdRKhWDXXgIeiUWlk8yc9KafgB409pFMze+ exaoBEbJNFkcsAnVihReOcHUgYWRp9n18TYDg05+UecKN9Fh6E0QQCgdHj75oUbGtIqO 3mUGnt9g/SphvWr+TZ9u5YRxK7aFifAW5Dx5AIAOOKIpFurGt3U5hfUiXTerCbuaQCju sa23A11+T6lHsIVg7FYyr7jE5myKHOIZgzgf1yOhWecOorc3zIyx3r2jNO8EOC+f2Y49 QPkQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531OFn5FUf+X2SpFQplMCv6PcdQC05cNcqqt4FWi4MvMvlE4VT0b 4r0sIGE48EXTsNMjmkNkeAcIAVVo8eQcm57jnWcM7NDEcno= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzNhmf1mPYt2pIjxdRUtkaf5aMhFa/B7QSIZL3+6mg8Viy8rFLPiAVlU8atneFwwxC+guxPd6m9JAaUUbwcqzk= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:fb43:: with SMTP id iq3mr7816601pjb.175.1607607908644; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 05:45:08 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 07:45:08 -0600 In-Reply-To: <87o8j1537q.fsf@bzg.fr> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.210.180; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-pf1-f180.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:260649 Archived-At: Bastien writes: > Yes, I recommend sending bug reports to emacs-orgmode@gnu.org first. I have been thinking a little bit about the org-mode bugs we currently have in the Emacs bug tracker. In general, of course we can keep them open if it helps and the status quo seems to work mostly fine. But it seems like these bugs risk becoming a bit forgotten and unattended. Perhaps we would be better off forwarding any org-mode bugs to you for tracking instead. The alternatives I see are: 1. Reassign any such bugs to package "org-mode", which leaves them at: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/pkgreport.cgi?package=org-mode 2. Close these bugs in our tracker and forward them to emacs-orgmode@gnu.org. 3. Leave it all alone; continue as we have been. Do you have any preference or thoughts about the above? (Please forgive me if this has already been discussed in the past. I tried searching emacs-devel but couldn't find anything.)