bug#31962: 27.0; imenu.el constructs - names and doc

[Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se>]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2018 18:51:23 -0700 (PDT)
>> From: Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>
>>
>> 1. `imenu--generic-function' should not have a double-hyphen in its
>> name.  It is the main function in the library, and it is explicitly
>> referenced by multiple doc strings in the file
>
> As long as this function is not autoloaded, we have no unequivocal
> proof that it's the main function in the library.  A function that is
> the workhorse of a library can legitimately be an internal function.
>
> I agree that this case is somewhat borderline, but I don't have enough
> time and energy to make the changes in the current system, because the
> problems it creates sound very minor to me.
>
> I made small fixes in 2 doc strings, but that's as far as I was
> prepared to go in this case.
>
>> including that of a user option
>> (`imenu-generic-skip-comments-and-strings') and that of the
>> principal configuration variable (`imenu-generic-expression'), which
>> is defined per mode.
>
> The doc string of imenu-generic-skip-comments-and-strings was one of
> those I changed.
>
>> 2. The doc string of `imenu--generic-function' says this, with zero
>> description of INDEX-NAME INDEX-POSITION FUNCTION and ARGUMENTS:
>>
>>   The return value is an alist of the form
>>    (INDEX-NAME . INDEX-POSITION)
>>   or
>>    (INDEX-NAME INDEX-POSITION FUNCTION ARGUMENTS...)
>>   The return value may also consist of nested index alists like:
>>    (INDEX-NAME . INDEX-ALIST)
>>   depending on PATTERNS.
>>
>> Each of those pieces of the return value should be specified, not just
>> named.
>
> Not as long as this is an internal function.
>
>> 3. Similarly, other functions and variables should be renamed to use a
>> single, not a double, hyphen, starting with `imenu--sort-by-name' and
>> `imenu--index-alist'.  I don't argue now that NO functions wnd variables
>> in the library should have names declaring that they are internal, but a
>> better judgment call is in order.
>
> Likewise.

It looks like Eli made the necessary changes above, and I see nothing
more to do here.  I'm therefore closing this bug report.  Please reopen
if that's incorrect.

Best regards,
Stefan Kangas