From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#53941: 27.2; socks + tor dont work with https Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2023 15:25:19 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87pmntfym7.fsf@example.com> <8735kl1v58.fsf@neverwas.me> <87a6emftzx.fsf@example.com> <87k0do5km1.fsf@neverwas.me> <87pmn5n3tu.fsf@neverwas.me> <87mti99j1f.fsf@neverwas.me> <87wnh7hkgi.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmmz947k.fsf@neverwas.me> <8735ju44sk.fsf@neverwas.me> <87lexikwu5.fsf@neverwas.me> <87mt8baygn.fsf_-_@neverwas.me> <8335a3nguk.fsf@gnu.org> <87fse1kfe8.fsf@neverwas.me> <831qpln7zg.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1005"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 53941@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org, gnuhacker@member.fsf.org, "J.P." To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 07 00:26:15 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qe0yV-000AWk-9Y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 07 Sep 2023 00:26:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qe0yI-0005lK-PP; Wed, 06 Sep 2023 18:26:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qe0yG-0005l9-Rf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2023 18:26:00 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qe0yG-0005Vn-Iw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2023 18:26:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qe0yH-0006xl-K0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2023 18:26:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2023 22:26:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 53941 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 53941-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B53941.169403913326731 (code B ref 53941); Wed, 06 Sep 2023 22:26:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 53941) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Sep 2023 22:25:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38056 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qe0xp-0006x5-Cg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2023 18:25:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lf1-x136.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::136]:59871) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qe0xj-0006wi-HO for 53941@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2023 18:25:31 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lf1-x136.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-500b66f8b27so465032e87.3 for <53941@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 06 Sep 2023 15:25:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1694039120; x=1694643920; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=LlbKSrP8Rj8h2Po0KKD1Gh8MrEZ94BpUrUtYWuDFnJ0=; b=EFCIH55K5Bs0ghTBRjLr5Zgjv0wQokjQoisvLOdmdWvZjL1ZnXqN0Xy51Wkd7AJZQT VNmjctb1BeIee3wjS86ofl0FdFoRy/cLzKklCGby9j8rX+WxPvp3JZ3mh4HSLpwt0gDq wxDwwpsDf4+HkzMJg4vwxrdR0haKS8i83miHx6pqGAsDoJkYd2KrFWELDa5l6h69OODw yM45IhOPWlcvlZekG8sFQfkiH70dZoZbJrbUbyIxA5Ml9Oo0bkTx8hkSh0EoUlgMCSyN gM6yjYYycmBNOH4aeV7SVUX9SujvjALJY7hjMXGTDiZSu42tmBg3uUgXEie/Xzkl0DGH VBlA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1694039120; x=1694643920; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=LlbKSrP8Rj8h2Po0KKD1Gh8MrEZ94BpUrUtYWuDFnJ0=; b=kxg+poqkjn1Zc3IbSbUBZAshVbPECGSTRBz8uyzI5So2sR8wwhZwvW86PYRVFRuyii IOBxPDLI18yleaIGGeePLga5Z+WxZYQ9xT6Z0FITDzUcHumDyWEwhuhb9UR3tAJQ5+q4 BVSLypF0NyiAs0uUWMUhDbc2dimSdXHYYJUhKMfT04ewyCsQ1UX+8eou1NeVBLv2K2yr B/ocq8BgQP47VYq9uX9AyAeZYVedDWyriQaSS6UknLykeQfZZSJF/t5hbOkWYX4TA9rj ArYQDGgOgN1VUWBiuoLcN3C58HVid7Ts94O/gt/UqrNJGFpr060RHIVhjwFZxel+y969 iJnw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyZ0pWwdPee8T0Fldn5wiRUMkYl3OUjC9ZbgHDjNHc5+AYK2cKU V/hTQxG1ou3hVoBMPEOIPeQdVWTyQKAoKnEL5qc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFPjaXuWI2Dt0FcY+5EjZhV1LjKmTXAAw+cwlQJRXxHcZI90rum4kxOi9cShcGXmPUFgW3gwsRpbkRPprcDnu8= X-Received: by 2002:a19:384c:0:b0:500:b2f6:592 with SMTP id d12-20020a19384c000000b00500b2f60592mr2915259lfj.50.1694039120016; Wed, 06 Sep 2023 15:25:20 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 6 Sep 2023 15:25:19 -0700 In-Reply-To: <831qpln7zg.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 29 Nov 2022 16:36:03 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:269590 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> > I'm really uncomfortable with installing these changes before the release >> > branch is cut. The changes are hardly trivial, some controversial even to >> > my eyes, even though I'm no expert on network connections. >> >> Well, I myself am just about the furthest thing from (an expert), which >> certainly doesn't comport well with dropping rash changes at the >> eleventh hour. (That was rather disrespectful on my part, so shame on >> me.) As such, if it's easier to revisit this once things settle down, >> just ignore this email and I'll re-ping you sometime down the road. > > Yes, please do. The branch is cut now, so if we agree on installing such > changes on master, it's now up to you when to post another version of these > changes with the requisite fixes. Could we revisit this now? It sounds like something we'd want to fix.