From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#65882: 29.1; rcirc doesn't rejoin channels automatically on reconnecting Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 01:46:14 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87bke85hsb.fsf@gmail.com> <87a5tobby9.fsf@debian-hx90.lan> <871qf0atqs.fsf@debian-hx90.lan> <878r97ooxs.fsf@posteo.net> <87a5tf3714.fsf@debian-hx90.lan> <87r0mrwkyp.fsf@posteo.net> <875y4331m2.fsf@debian-hx90.lan> <87cyyavcoh.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7188"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 65882-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Ryan Yeske , Leo Liu To: Philip Kaludercic , Manphiz Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 22 10:47:12 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qjbod-0001eE-S2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:47:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qjboM-0002Kd-2j; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 04:46:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qjboK-0002Ci-Bw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 04:46:52 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qjboJ-0002Ov-W3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 04:46:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qjboU-0002Xo-3h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 04:47:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 08:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 65882 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 65882-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D65882.16953723979746 (code D ref 65882); Fri, 22 Sep 2023 08:47:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 65882-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Sep 2023 08:46:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35290 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qjbo4-0002X7-Kj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 04:46:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lj1-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::229]:51661) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qjbnz-0002Ws-LA for 65882-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 04:46:35 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lj1-x229.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2bffd6c1460so29101341fa.3 for <65882-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 01:46:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1695372375; x=1695977175; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=SUKCHppxTka1LmRf13wlwNZevHZQAzCuWnsXuXSI3q0=; b=Ug7xrHctuFCuDGhf/LbW64lMzvI4ixutnBaK1dfoMYyo1zEbMi+dmnEoDwsTZpQ5od V6wt7ig3/ngph8mv1mF7CvGA8vfO22A2+cWC0tIuy8AXDZMmZFMpJHkAi3OGKFy3dBN/ 3FlfzD2tQ8GuxKvnDPU+YK3Y2dEkT842fV4o83lXagK1nz43g8f3Ck+8iMRRg4rnlo50 tGFjw75gtVXDNT1/W8cLya6htyqc45HdvetuQ36gjKt/DDebNZv9y/hBrnaBh/HEHAFx 7F2IGR4TF8JDp9hoGhnvbHBy8Dx2EYy3WLYXuN+hR4G+06hh7FBt4m1QraAQb3tAEc7M 4JuA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1695372375; x=1695977175; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=SUKCHppxTka1LmRf13wlwNZevHZQAzCuWnsXuXSI3q0=; b=U2Nzw7XAzwlVwcE+6pxC9CWjBc3ggUADCUlVTjlhKywnb3cJxSLG+L6IAPJoTCARH6 djkxL1QEoVcJeeUVqKa/5PvhJ78QtWNPH4UuVKcdv2xGUhMLPKPccqWOy1+w6ituCEPq KkBd4PoAturmlGvFNwyC0hoTJLsl/1atlPKXFxB2Tm0/LcIupXql+TyHOUxoocdUmpED osZDcPLBuGCoy54iumVYAzWzh6mBCjSsS+VLkfgqC2rOfVWoVx/Mcrsfq9zO5dDduFde 78pGYwrS2x/h4St0x27RukHBX/0VPUQKFOkvoJi1uIY3TGRp0mSXtTXQ+WvVwD9OCnuH egng== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyk/pOJ4syjTJCO3vpq99sXNN7jyxQi9y5XT/wNzkHMF/9UTiyd MBTj+pMtDBFvK/Y2LaLBgijSX1SspGPTz6mFIAo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGMvLEf9WWfppqLZrnuHAhEb3DJY4XCZ7TcllAE+VwOzys9PKcsz26iDyFHypPT3DJ936yngl6GgB0OEIv8MjI= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9806:0:b0:2b6:fa3f:9230 with SMTP id a6-20020a2e9806000000b002b6fa3f9230mr6538161ljj.46.1695372374899; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 01:46:14 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 01:46:14 -0700 In-Reply-To: <87cyyavcoh.fsf@posteo.net> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:271054 Archived-At: Philip Kaludercic writes: >> Additionally, is it OK to backport this to 29 branch or even 28 branch? > > I don't know if bugs are backported onto emacs-28, the branch seems to > be stale. We don't plan to make any more releases of Emacs 28, so we don't bother with backporting fixes there. > The emacs-29 branch might be viable, but I don't want to decide that > myself. If Stefan is fine with that, I can take care of it. I don't necessarily object, but is it a regression? Is the change safe? If the answer to either of those questions is "no", I think master is the safer choice. >> Or is there any automatic backport process for release branches? > > Not that I know of. The process is indeed manual.