From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Org-mode bugs in the Emacs bug tracker Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 07:11:10 -0600 Message-ID: References: <20201206092641.xv5gkqcwbpc5gau7@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87o8j1537q.fsf@bzg.fr> <87pn3g52gg.fsf@bzg.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17746"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Boruch Baum , Emacs-Devel List To: Bastien Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 11 14:13:01 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kniEG-0004Pf-HM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 14:13:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45594 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kniEF-0002OX-KW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 08:12:59 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52592) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kniCY-0001L4-Ln for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 08:11:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pj1-f52.google.com ([209.85.216.52]:51079) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kniCW-00006h-Us; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 08:11:14 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pj1-f52.google.com with SMTP id lj6so767770pjb.0; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 05:11:12 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=98y29lbB3INHhfV/7MKFV+YuNlWBceIlW9izVRmz+CQ=; b=nUMZH8TkvQvAPzzA01wppAYjKF3ICYPOUHSaSxsXMmFpYFJRrIoTmMZORYRuFvzYVW H9yTeD6Xk5MLcjBPXJBmYLC/7hGSNp3rcbDaBuyZn9sv+uaVohheEhrhqvY6D78wu0jD ept49X8HJTUu7dvg3wY9z2Qa9+O7jMIn0DqdzIhGEjmQg/aAisanov9xU9ffb1q8BQsy nSmIElnHT4nzT6DvYMQPLW1PkJPB+vvdk3B1xqlOdPhZfeijdD9Iy5GkJl90p9ltB20q Eh/7kVFtt9KpBOKGr7Xv0z1gOgUftxfvhFiYfXAzEmI/sauWBpAcWc8pL1zd0KdIe9xX kXVA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533zn/Bz2MpIWzJ5lb60w9BmHMk7zPO4KRez+6s9ZCFmJ5BsYNoW CCdf2eCex5/Uy3kNZCoDAgQH58XosyP0uEDVEnoxsRGQM3E= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx778/pgSyPlMq4dQ1mKtw9RzZW87oZZRE9P2Y3HFkrppGgqgOB1hBYisYxS/mTGyDxv/T+vmXw05uUHvFA+NQ= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ac93:b029:db:c725:e321 with SMTP id h19-20020a170902ac93b02900dbc725e321mr10925599plr.41.1607692270980; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 05:11:10 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 07:11:10 -0600 In-Reply-To: <87pn3g52gg.fsf@bzg.fr> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.216.52; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-pj1-f52.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:260689 Archived-At: Bastien writes: > Stefan Kangas writes: > >> 3. Leave it all alone; continue as we have been. > > I think the one above is okay, as long as (1) we clearly encourage > users to send bugs to emacs-orgmode@gnu.org and (2) we find someone in > Org's community in charge of handling org-related Emacs debbugs bugs. Thanks. But in addition to emacs-orgmode@gnu.org there are then three places to look for Org-mode bugs: 1. https://updates.orgmode.org/ 2. https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/pkgreport.cgi?package=org-mode 3. https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/pkgreport.cgi?package=emacs I therefore still think we should consider getting rid of at least one of the last two for org-mode bugs. (My preference would be to reassign any relevant bugs to org-mode, but either way should help make things clearer.) WDYT?