From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: File names in ChangeLog entries Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 03:02:16 -0800 Message-ID: References: <831r2xt32t.fsf@gnu.org> <83ilw8sa9j.fsf@gnu.org> <835ys8s1gg.fsf@gnu.org> <87czmgruyc.fsf@gnuvola.org> <83h7bsqfxh.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnknpkvc.fsf@red-bean.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17838"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Stefan Monnier , Thien-Thi Nguyen To: Karl Fogel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 02 12:06:29 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1msjv2-0004SH-S4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 02 Dec 2021 12:06:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37058 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1msjv1-0007vC-Kd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 02 Dec 2021 06:06:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:42980) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1msjrI-00068t-UW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Dec 2021 06:02:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pl1-f172.google.com ([209.85.214.172]:41501) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1msjr9-0000hr-92; Thu, 02 Dec 2021 06:02:35 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pl1-f172.google.com with SMTP id k4so19943087plx.8; Thu, 02 Dec 2021 03:02:18 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/fNv//WN2lHYWSKTcgUR6w0NuzDFLwqdf2qeV9+FT4s=; b=n6uTMB0F8/TcSAuPnakhwlu+/4jyqOohJ5BV7V5JSvJXmubj/MUxw2WiegBt2/vqTV SBIlSWkDMUJOfWNr7z26PXg8pFf7HRx/KGIA0cCb4UskA7TCLg0NFMmj7rjAZKQhHfhx enmc9KKl3Pe9Xl1WhJqphklX/lnMZcSqe7BMZfz8l52t3TjprHrJONrtwc6en1lN2/EO mDpx9SDJpDBt83Zxa3Yf5sE9NfoCQ45hPUpX+lBBtGGiy7LJ3wTGMfjg6xcvTd0xv0k1 gYPxepmU7XSHg1ExOK9JynE7XerC3H6JLykK+1/ZBawNNQR4yfZUoWgabRRDZZM8+bBv fqOA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531npxwPdb8c9Q0k9xnA/4aud5EHVZv7QrCZvUSmTjJb/6CPkIIP BJyOHsdq+Bs05jR6os0i7118bqSuzn6C+c0ReYQ+IWCP X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyI9tO92k5ikobZVi2ZkR0g9JcFGi4ccQUoef7FDL5MMnepnWvvRoUw3H3iYWvIdT2yAof1JT01jq75xEchjC0= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1e0e:: with SMTP id pg14mr5066363pjb.143.1638442937460; Thu, 02 Dec 2021 03:02:17 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 03:02:16 -0800 In-Reply-To: <87wnknpkvc.fsf@red-bean.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.214.172; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-pl1-f172.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.248, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:280744 Archived-At: Karl Fogel writes: > Our CONTRIBUTE file does already say that 50 chars for the summary > line is "nicer". (Although it gives that advice two points down > from where we first mention the summary line, which is odd. I've > attached a patch here that tries to improve this, and would > appreciate others' review.) LGTM.