From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master f8fed41 2/3: image-dired: Improve XDG compliance Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 16:24:30 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83sfwp1c27.fsf@gnu.org> <83tuh3yil6.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9206"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Emacs developers To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 26 16:26:17 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mfNP6-0002BU-Bt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 16:26:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55422 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mfNP5-0000B6-Be for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 10:26:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51648) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mfNNc-0006vN-LS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 10:24:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pl1-f175.google.com ([209.85.214.175]:33477) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mfNNb-0001MV-Bt; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 10:24:44 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pl1-f175.google.com with SMTP id s24so6451932plp.0; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 07:24:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=TZxVd6e8LPinjwQYGz/MGuZDLvNElJaby3gU+ayVI80=; b=C6h5FCLxnt7Mj2eiqttX8IR2ZK7tPTqb8VNZ1VwB+aVB3r4rl53GdPwDrlSJM63Ity rHXUX+N2+KsPctOyQiwURMC6C3wMWz/zPM2LPH5GeM+8D0fQJoUAFFa/pOCnE4iVX5aQ dBdGmoCoTQ90w+UHiRNrxrRQepVXXYUAhBAu7dzL+Hn7LMFcB90L72qkKk4057FpfyDG kJ1/C4O6rt58Il5jGptnzd9KEFQI6C6jZaMLcrpvcGcdAiXDJA0Oipzg5tktTVpdc2t6 stRN/LtoRGqAF5U1YYmpUggQ2o4F2y/0dbiZsXiOJG2oj39zn2dYeIVQuB59KMnZklcm Vq1A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530BhqG3Vu0vG9J16HENtKSa9YnAyoAobs53TuARNIH/bmKzk5nM 0t0U3R1lfRVz20YSdhPAm6g3F0Xnrd46l3wpoJfctsco X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJygvUmVnBeyX68uvxWw4Napsb0Sjn9JgdwjoAY5A2m64VrM+FhKTVo8WbesHXOD2b3xxAfT7Hd2IcB6e/eX5WE= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3b86:: with SMTP id pc6mr26453339pjb.143.1635258281735; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 07:24:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83tuh3yil6.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.214.175; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-pl1-f175.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:277867 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I'm against seeing more and more > xdg-FOO stuff in the application code. That's not why we agreed to > include it in Emacs. I don't see why: as I explained, this will make implementing your idea easier, not harder. Right?