From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17623: 24.4.50; incorrect example for `apply-partially' in (elisp) `Calling Functions' Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 22:24:38 +0200 Message-ID: References: <9fd43ff1-d6cf-4ac6-b173-2fd634f45a98@default> <871tua2o12.fsf@web.de> <1ac7ebe5-6b43-4367-beb8-df7d9f5b6750@default> <87tx75ni8k.fsf@web.de> <8338ep6kk1.fsf@gnu.org> <87pphsor8h.fsf@web.de> <83tx746fgd.fsf@gnu.org> <87ee8cyt1m.fsf@web.de> <83bl3g55t5.fsf@gnu.org> <87ilxnuczs.fsf@web.de> <835ytn6fzy.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgqzsqt6.fsf@web.de> <87wnm0i1cc.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="28534"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 17623@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 26 22:25:59 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mfT1C-0007AJ-MJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 22:25:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47536 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mfT19-0003IB-FT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 16:25:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51990) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mfT0I-0003GN-QR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 16:25:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36096) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mfT0I-0005iH-Dw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 16:25:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mfT0I-0005Ef-5t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 16:25:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 20:25:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17623 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 17623-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17623.163527990020115 (code B ref 17623); Tue, 26 Oct 2021 20:25:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17623) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Oct 2021 20:25:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47642 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mfT0G-0005EM-35 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 16:25:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pf1-f181.google.com ([209.85.210.181]:35402) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mfT0E-0005E9-0B for 17623@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 16:24:58 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pf1-f181.google.com with SMTP id l203so574047pfd.2 for <17623@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 13:24:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=SNW2ZRjkziiqs6Y2mWz/C6FiMVWrBCnU5mrT7/Glrds=; b=TitRXAz+sMtmBHgOmjDxxgTbZhGj9ZhrZfbCBYHlatxEu0U9l5+UXzlEiS9rHyjnlq foRQ+0WIamOFq2GVMJ80NXLtIULY8IGkaVdeo0+9a4tlErJLdwecY0Vuwm21bc/VWH79 IbXEuA/JCVxS4K54/zLPMdgj5EgjVfnzdcuLEPKTRKh0AG+opL2I0a/39pHrKZNtof19 QCDQCXFJKwdS+7Sw7+8nBMk2bxrNJNaEKxbHXhoOwNxN8XbUrqCJO77XurPxIlPI9hfR PonYNmAv4ObZpCJyilzL5P2bDLuTIZmtrcuKeuM/7u52Cfqx70XHhCInLDVRinCQL7ZY ad8A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532IKJPCtIFMbhRg0H4BmKUiQ+7D2e/zdiyRPypYXKXV/TxCLbEB g/lxdPGWFJPJJiIc6z6hhlp+7VnmsIlBn64Bq9RufU+lPSY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxoNaEaTglDD5mNTD/x8yUS4nOWSQpcgbi+seTVen/1R2SClYQg8ld40B4jQCAQ3AaSdYkv4PF/1Eujy7ZLPQo= X-Received: by 2002:a63:b958:: with SMTP id v24mr12791990pgo.114.1635279881068; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 13:24:41 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 22:24:38 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87wnm0i1cc.fsf@web.de> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:218407 Archived-At: Michael Heerdegen writes: > When reading again, I wondered if we should convert that whole manual > page to use function quoting. E.g. > > (apply-partially '+ 1) ~> (apply-partially #'+ 1) > > The same problem exists for a few other pages. Should I make a separate > report about this? I don't have a strong opinion either way. I think what could be better documented are the benefits of quoting with function (or #'). AFAICT, it is not really explained on (info "(elisp) Anonymous Functions"), it is more hinted at.