From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Concern about new binding. Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2021 07:23:18 -0800 Message-ID: References: <87zh0mmr54.fsf@gmail.com> <87y2g5smya.fsf@gmail.com> <4FF55FBF-573D-4A70-B3FC-682CA25B7ECB@gnu.org> <83lfc53whk.fsf@gnu.org> <20210203180142.seu6o3i6u7jhkyrh@Ergus> <83eehx3to5.fsf@gnu.org> <20210203221628.xgvvxjvh56gyswba@Ergus> <20210204070033.pm4ido4hq7a6twif@Ergus> <83sg6brhyg.fsf@gnu.org> <5588fb25805d486be704@heytings.org> <83pn1epxpd.fsf@gnu.org> <5588fb25800131ef8afa@heytings.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29815"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Gregory Heytings , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 06 16:24:40 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l8PRw-0007fZ-5y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 16:24:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59996 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8PRv-0003eO-8U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 10:24:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52490) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8PQi-0002yp-DQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 10:23:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pg1-x535.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::535]:45637) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8PQg-0001Rp-Jj; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 10:23:24 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pg1-x535.google.com with SMTP id o21so5294585pgn.12; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 07:23:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=b/DtRMxZHtqGRx5SX+zM5OCy3Cj/WOUaXR1DZsRHyEU=; b=AdyVpzu3A7Vf8UJ8sp7s3DTCmAZKMirGtBTkoZ8EHVVItkJO2jEPd1KFQztEbzLg+Z a66N+89ZjLzqXELkt67F43btFqvxzxSXJ1g36ef41qMqRDiZ2tUKTtDtNt7gw6KZHX/e a61ge6swwP6cZ83PFhP+XQ+DvU3U742sJo2lHaPtmI64Xu7v5C/DFFt+VLk+pBmgH9oH 4tmJEz2/m2WK0uVGns06kc3Hwe6lvcVns0bMw+ES+IPwmkQt5nNUWy0QOz7OmyTMxDM4 A0kcUmLkD5HbBTKmO/PArKKFonbJU583yAXB3v5HpCmcsP0YL2Y/sAT9j9/U0/CE4Nx8 wf6w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=b/DtRMxZHtqGRx5SX+zM5OCy3Cj/WOUaXR1DZsRHyEU=; b=dTDshDLsxnRruEHttzH+/dD/MRHiEJ+XwW7S2TxeXbVG+h0uYkZIvgU+3UNUvlxIss FnK3e+PuO3p5r/ft1u4efExCdzZwcR//7Iz5JCBfej05yNlZ1Mq/zYpSaFAk5BTrWsRG aNsNQEJ17V5fvNGORU8/mKuS46Do2osZvIf+YH5uFQYWoYRIJWCetaqIp0biDh+aQicJ dBfi9G9H/OGY7czTIKJnPP4cJJp3qIdtIiGLUhx7d75LhLd45tSsjSFoBHggy8Jzjdfm RfDZRbnPyGPLjKEqfwdRhgrCoJQ4bqsTpgmMlYzHfWYUJdmXVbCnCmpmPda6WDR97XpG mLpA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533wCbF1NeoqPK3KxN2Ryd3nLdFAnLsWW0fqRc0Aqf86XsghaQbG ZH/+D1U09mHxMU9oHODCcuJevqFdQzJ9cygHouLTWMvV X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxl5joLuNL9dnMUArv1D6wfgTnIsVDc6WpeTosrIKC1djIkp91JzlfDn5BwEFNuLYkJ3M/cgVryrNd/zEyEjcg= X-Received: by 2002:a62:d453:0:b029:1d6:587b:5d31 with SMTP id u19-20020a62d4530000b02901d6587b5d31mr9829644pfl.58.1612624998903; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 07:23:18 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 07:23:18 -0800 In-Reply-To: <5588fb25800131ef8afa@heytings.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::535; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-pg1-x535.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:264068 Archived-At: Gregory Heytings writes: > Yes, it is unavoidable that some people will be against changing a > binding. I have no preference between the three proposed keys, and > anticipated that there would be more objections against using "t" for that > purpose. If we put "t" aside, there are still two other options: "z" and > "o". FWIW, I would not like to see C-o change as I use it daily. But I could live with it as I can rebind it locally. It would be too bad that we would then lose the nice symmetry between `C-o' and `C-x C-o'. I'm in favour of rebinding C-z to exactly one thing: `undo'. It would IMO be very unfortunate if we do rebind it yet miss out on the opportunity to make Emacs more like other applications.