From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Modernize frame-title-format: "%b - GNU Emacs" Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 02:18:21 -0700 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32975"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: "Alfred M. Szmidt" To: James Cloos , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 28 11:18:55 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kBaX9-0008Up-Jm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 11:18:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48624 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kBaX8-0002Zg-MH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 05:18:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44078) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kBaWf-00026n-VK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 05:18:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yb1-f180.google.com ([209.85.219.180]:41429) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kBaWe-0003Rz-9B; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 05:18:25 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-yb1-f180.google.com with SMTP id h20so156741ybj.8; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 02:18:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6cU+fjZhdAzf06QeDVVjiYiaUPZ0mgG0i/KJ2pRKkcE=; b=qSslbM8DsLivB7Dy6Ex2q3jb/xSbibfTw7xpfbOwmG7jnP7ohjL/bvTwozmcKIhWcu 5z8y56vpI4a1LoOYSSAUgyUw3/X2ylSpDJ7oZZO4UDKGntlMQbq/9JOOeUQ+YlypQX/3 6OdFrJNn4DBFOKvNg2j7fzt00oiiIyvSzCzIu7/Pi/QQXx+MOCv7RnMWXC9SV070XsNb o5IO5igaNhwa+eSlTO+p5qL5yL7ZMmnE87SvaeBPDC2NfpnWOURBUfl8NB4cyqBRV2Al JkriiC3jX24hwS/kY85rqOhbF7WK6T1lZBV1eGB+dFrt1eFkaY0l1LYG7YLjQGWQCpjE DapQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5310K4rpqignIYDg5CUSGxVJuiN1cpReQ86V1qJZdd0NJCvEYZjh wo7PWgKOerlq+iSc/LFcemRHKiz6z4vX0qPlfyA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx88tZ9Hl3MhxQ1Xs6oo96BGgoXhjwiHhi1A5LjNrS3oSBTMNlY1KMUNlaBuwEL5g2DJP1iXLNXfctXqGCZcps= X-Received: by 2002:a5b:410:: with SMTP id m16mr1090911ybp.309.1598606302689; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 02:18:22 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 02:18:21 -0700 In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.219.180; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-yb1-f180.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/08/28 05:18:22 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:254350 Archived-At: James Cloos writes: > and losing the invocation-name@system-name bit would be a significant > regression. You are the first person to say that `invocation-name' is important to keep. Would like to expand on the use-case you have in mind, and why you think it is important to keep as the default? Best regards, Stefan Kangas