From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Improved welcome screen Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 09:59:11 +0200 Message-ID: References: <863691n4xl.wl-me@enzu.ru> <86blno9yle.wl-me@enzu.ru> <87d0845msg.fsf@yahoo.com> <87h7xgjasw.fsf@yahoo.com> <875zdwjais.fsf@yahoo.com> <6a198677-41b6-4dbd-39d0-2b01550d53cf@yandex.ru> <875zdv9jf3.fsf@yahoo.com> <7AE22CF7-3A15-4F99-976F-970EF0C2F40F@traduction-libre.org> <83d07s4vtw.fsf@gnu.org> <89828f8d-e48e-2bfd-869a-2d1d8cb5bfe9@yandex.ru> <835zdk4tcx.fsf@gnu.org> <329b4fd6-b0f9-6877-23b3-dca7c1e5968b@yandex.ru> <83tv142k1p.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="61099"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Jean-Christophe Helary , Emacs developers , Dmitry Gutov To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 28 10:10:29 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jTLK1-000FnU-IU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 10:10:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45822 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jTLK0-0006l5-DY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 04:10:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46852) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jTLHp-0002Wj-4m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 04:09:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jTLEA-0000hQ-VV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 04:08:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yb1-f171.google.com ([209.85.219.171]:41109) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jTL9K-0006FN-BQ; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 03:59:26 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-yb1-f171.google.com with SMTP id t9so3404780ybo.8; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 00:59:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lDoQ2+RxKD/uHz+xNvDLMWikt+TFkOFdIJdikHifKIU=; b=tFtZN/T0fvyQqsLWSmYQQOoxRaOlIXRATDElPW1XrbRpSdhTiUkXi2MO8HM5G+TJxL ZG0UKNLfuUttmRyuWLkUb6/+QXJmQ/dSkHVXopqI2GjAlmpWJJaYI1E6Fy7fP555ia/A Gdgl3Zvxrn5zZIrKz9m8Z+vGODg2KUZpI6pz3RCCnrzRzMhhrD8wmXfoOuJAFKTYiMtJ UOE+MxLFdloksbtoIMGO1kH08GfN0PpiaStKwALMpoZuCqhbc5565clkpURFplvSgVIm z5sZ+/0fCyA9E5kdBdopA4lLLVgH9EoUrGThRK1kI1pns6DaCj6HxmQqobtdEZv2yCln CFIg== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0Pub1ejk/Dly0OdgJpI4HLptBWtWNrQ9XpzXE6GY4hRy88xbZgE7r KuX/DGA7w+oBV0n12SqQN/p1nUL2wzkuq0GSybcjBhz/MpI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKTFS3Qgsehi1Ml4jqqSyJIYmXcHAD1BCrgS8xh6elv8157JMtbb5ZqUC91cJR9Z28Y7Yb6TTGcgWoQLQzS9XM= X-Received: by 2002:a25:fc08:: with SMTP id v8mr41231448ybd.389.1588060763097; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 00:59:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83tv142k1p.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.219.171; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-yb1-f171.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/04/28 03:59:25 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.219.171 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:248005 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > > Second thing: I think Stefan's work is a modification of the "About" > > buffer. Whereas you are talking about the startup screen. They are close > > enough to mistake one for another, but still different. For some reason. > > The Subject says "welcome screen", and you yourself use "startup > screen". So I thought this is what we were talking about. My intention was to modify the welcome screen, yes. I ended up modifying the about screen (display-about-screen) only because I mistakenly believed they were the same. (They are very similar, to be sure. But there are some differences.) Please consider my draft as a suggestion for a new welcome screen (display-startup-screen). Once we have a better understanding of what should be done there, I'll be happy to suggest similar improvements to the about screen. Best regards, Stefan Kangas