From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37420: [PATCH] Recommend against SHA-1 for security-related applications Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:17:44 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87v9tsv65b.fsf@gnus.org> <87ef0grneg.fsf@gnus.org> <87d0fzq3p0.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="108572"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 37420@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 17 11:19:11 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iA9de-000S5n-Jx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:19:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43038 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iA9dd-00017b-9x for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 05:19:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34007) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iA9dX-00017Q-3C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 05:19:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iA9dW-0003cg-4B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 05:19:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42813) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iA9dW-0003cZ-1B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 05:19:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iA9dV-0003Qe-QA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 05:19:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 09:19:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37420 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 37420-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37420.156871188613114 (code B ref 37420); Tue, 17 Sep 2019 09:19:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37420) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Sep 2019 09:18:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51634 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iA9ca-0003PQ-7t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 05:18:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pf1-f177.google.com ([209.85.210.177]:33341) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iA9cX-0003Ov-Li for 37420@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 05:18:02 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pf1-f177.google.com with SMTP id q10so1810032pfl.0 for <37420@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 02:18:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dbU40E+ynjxtJk37SrfT4zhnnuS2CN7IUHZnR1FIzN0=; b=HdFyUDhdKucUz4QdANDgKp00IOZVvdk90QmQ688oIjGk95njJ1tYZR66TNru8aJYRP SUlGJL2NXm5TaIF/ULylY5/2rXzokqiK30BTbMsyGoMtWrd7geDdZinY8Hxf4fMa6mTQ R9Dt70A5o+DGwiHV6v3GT9XoRtar2IxcWC53J1Ku7tKlHYgxHu2Ab9fX6C/vEBLEQ+pd R8dhJ0XXfXpg8oTzIgsVuyGxQ6GZyN9/EHoRF3Msc0ZMTsWxEIBoDB6I66ads6tgS1kp CrRDZcZR+IN3BFDKyUqTjhZ85r/7wM9ZWC5/xEsdwXFzUYN+uXJocW03F1ubA1fBiP3u aJ/Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWTxHEs8XpEswqhfaY7cYrrKqmjbeNrzT9goERQNNuRcYuzKkpX YVN4KB8St+V14f6IEWgnmSNcSLSZ4p/jjt/Ax4g= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqznZsxuCusRDQ10cGb7YL4sMnH+RuAbGQ1ad1LhvpxKqFEjodPu4VNLWa1Q5pqtnyYdhfUZKIcV6l8VvlX6ty4= X-Received: by 2002:a63:69c1:: with SMTP id e184mr2287766pgc.198.1568711875796; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 02:17:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87d0fzq3p0.fsf@gnus.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:166623 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > > +These symbols corresponds to the following hashing algorithms: > > + > > + md5 - MD5 > > + sha1 - SHA-1 > > + sha224 - SHA-2 / SHA-224 > > + sha256 - SHA-2 / SHA-384 > > + sha384 - SHA-2 / SHA-384 > > + sha512 - SHA-2 / SHA-512 > > I'm not sure these really clarify all that much? But I don't object to > it. They would help people like me who don't use this stuff very often and can't remember which one is SHA-1, SHA-2, SHA-3, etc. Of course, one could expect users to fire up a web browser and search the web for details instead. But as it stands, we don't document anywhere that sha512 is indeed SHA-2 as far as I can tell. > > --- a/test/lisp/emacs-lisp/package-resources/archive-contents [...] > Hm... is this related? No, please disregard that. I fixed it but then attached the wrong patch to the email. Best regards, Stefan Kangas