From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Variable pitch text filling Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 10:53:13 -0800 Message-ID: References: <87ilwft1ph.fsf@gnus.org> <87fsrcjkik.fsf@gnus.org> <83y254qkq3.fsf@gnu.org> <87y254i56e.fsf@gnus.org> <83tufsqkd3.fsf@gnu.org> <87tufsi3x7.fsf@gnus.org> <83o860qi1i.fsf@gnu.org> <87czmgi2ec.fsf@gnus.org> <83lf14qgpu.fsf@gnu.org> <87fsrcgmdu.fsf@gnus.org> <83ilw8qg2s.fsf@gnu.org> <874k7sglur.fsf@gnus.org> <83fsrcqeq2.fsf@gnu.org> <874k7ro20z.fsf@gnus.org> <83r1avpf6g.fsf@gnu.org> <87tufrl70i.fsf@gnus.org> <063c14ec-b60e-fc10-a9b9-8808e2f58b40@gmail.com> <2532e13c-f128-c486-0c5a-c9d561149927@gmail.com> <83lf1288sf.fsf@gnu.org> <81631a46-c049-5497-0c6b-49ac64132e90@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10746"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jim Porter , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 03 19:54:07 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mtDh8-0002d9-TH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 03 Dec 2021 19:54:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50558 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mtDh6-0006Bj-Lp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 03 Dec 2021 13:54:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34674) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mtDgK-00052Q-Ue for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Dec 2021 13:53:16 -0500 Original-Received: from [2607:f8b0:4864:20::62c] (port=45851 helo=mail-pl1-x62c.google.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mtDgJ-00050x-IW; Fri, 03 Dec 2021 13:53:16 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pl1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id b11so2699706pld.12; Fri, 03 Dec 2021 10:53:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=TtSQj5UcxUZvz3X5I8Eu/CGQGoN+9XTE7bc83DVkLus=; b=CK4T4Iri7lQCOjK9ph524GI7I4yHzCsy0rOd+CHHSjic0mxR5j3pYnfauomyfovlTJ nQ4sM2DVb5wlZuKNdCyog2Oj5/+ItH6aCqhXi3+2qfYS8C0TZfNjyGlqdKkjgqPic7eD Aij+crygDlxBs2yRuwHM4msrsuzw7B6ptnZDMhR5rvyAK3+b6j4mmUczvJ3nKshYXsvf wpSGMS6jm/P5+/Kpbpe2/LgntlkZv0oJn9klC6/DX7pB1C+otZ6/N2/VQskj/Lsm9xqK ffo1WrICXsqMU36xQ9nai24s64Q0baWELpqma8ApbLa9eTCurU/a8Pu0T1H9SfH5bShW 5lKA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=TtSQj5UcxUZvz3X5I8Eu/CGQGoN+9XTE7bc83DVkLus=; b=ORXkVUs9U36pN+6ziq7CNIAOXhJ6Ex7neZXQpqpy5UxrS3EL09bZ66oRD3K30avMx2 y9HyLL21GlWKJuMZHLGfM2GjZdAtZ1IfJPk7+FNIfwQApEnEd2zgiItZyEjv5bYkgaSi kAxQ7pdvXOYToGGAdQuOMz4SuflUO32g1lwriCgAz7cy4dX+iLrE6L6HtWdhJH966fmV t1iyya72g+M1x29/plyyS7Coh6kBDr4VCE5NTJIQ057ED78Qc+DpACnIvAfRJnZXgy8o ZpONe/8WbtvUjksJNmMSweqGghp2v+iZlHVtWE7RD1i9cMveJnMGUZGgkO/4LBtMgVfF J5AQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5321Sv52vooK4eUc28d55Wx/JU+WSVfPlfULCmdl7U5lOkNEZuAF N3eOCTRPMBMmFWnX+emvF4BWBF/rvaeYK2Y6LWA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwKgiQgFT5MRR0OP4g7obU57HWYwbJ50Q5Ineybj4lu2kF+GLvcIsownG+BGbzOoV4P5qzClhNU70jCxyNf1Ns= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:be10:: with SMTP id a16mr16025112pjs.133.1638557593698; Fri, 03 Dec 2021 10:53:13 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 10:53:13 -0800 In-Reply-To: <81631a46-c049-5497-0c6b-49ac64132e90@gmail.com> X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2607:f8b0:4864:20::62c (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::62c; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-pl1-x62c.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -12 X-Spam_score: -1.3 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, PDS_HP_HELO_NORDNS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:280857 Archived-At: Jim Porter writes: > I think it's still an issue, and making the indicator "louder" for > non-native EOL formats is probably still a good move. Sorry if I'm repeating myself, but just showing nothing by default will make it "louder" (more attention grabbing) when it is actually shown. > Maybe it'd be enough to make the indicator for non-native EOL formats be > a different color, or some other face property, like adding a bright box > around it. That would still be attention-grabbing, but wouldn't change > the size of the U:--- thing. I think we should be careful to avoid a Christmas tree effect though.