From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 95e8c7d 1/2: ; Fix typos Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 02:58:47 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20201009134249.15265.31644@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20201009134252.81B3620A15@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <83tuv35upc.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7r26037.fsf@gnu.org> <83wnzv3304.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29981"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Robert Pluim Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 16 11:59:46 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kTMWX-0007gx-AI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 11:59:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44648 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kTMWW-0006Dn-8u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 05:59:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48964) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kTMVg-0005fF-97 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 05:58:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ed1-f50.google.com ([209.85.208.50]:38213) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kTMVe-0000s1-At; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 05:58:51 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ed1-f50.google.com with SMTP id i5so1677516edr.5; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 02:58:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kcBw0a7d39Os8LpVcQwlP+uLDzTSiFcspZi8ax5NgA4=; b=box167k49pMD3XrRuMvihB/6kTcIIzO++lgzBlcyf++06LrGwA29SMnCPKsmvbcZ36 Skkmr4CxrksY7BPZw+by2XcZGORx1bzWlwkRtPGOx2WRjb1qj8z8ECoSQt+ZYAogOq2v u1/CVtpvW14v6aYjELh8h9iXlHctpsuisiO9eVWy73Ra9ELOK5M1oGyj2twZ8JYSpuJw Nssy6SaRY2ZGiTsu4cZNQMRz4S743ScClTxcRemm5aapk9DEKiTk/oFBX/cuj+ZEBESm Qkyp0f+vwoPk+S5wmBCafGBof+M2Ufrf02BPJKJ4Lq0uXnJkxIPfwDMWU6NGgwHQbi3e kkQA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5314SJbAY1003HgjQAW2Dn6SCGEHsM2+LRPkmU1BWrM6XPBbrH5v /+wu2p1f1OXnfAr4ej716hRzYsw8fMx2aylDIiPAv306 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwGeFUK8Qt/UNQCzvxjWAJr0KdhZNRk1AHNffT3PtR+yBGxMdDBe7Ot7/9iKWEjYQ3lD1qJpU65smO0Pgq7pnE= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:3133:: with SMTP id dd19mr3010124edb.100.1602842327935; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 02:58:47 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 02:58:47 -0700 In-Reply-To: <83wnzv3304.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.208.50; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-ed1-f50.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/16 05:58:48 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.248, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:257789 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> Since renaming symbols involves some pain, do we really need to b= e >> >> 100% consistent here? >> >> Stefan> I personally don't have a very strong opinion either way, FW= IW. >> >> I think I prefer consistency between the docstrings and the associated >> code to global consistency, and changing code is always risky, so I=CA= =BCd >> prefer if the docstrings were changed back. > > I tend to agree. OK, I've now reverted that part on master.