From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [nongnu] elpa/rainbow-delimiters a32b39bdfe: Add license file with GPLv3 Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2022 23:04:15 -0500 Message-ID: References: <164107430330.17202.17260845381664886032@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20220101215824.BB13CC0DEC3@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="31078"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 04 05:05:59 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n4b5D-0007rk-8V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2022 05:05:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50150 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n4b5B-0006xf-8l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 23:05:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39830) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n4b3c-00066F-EE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 23:04:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pj1-f45.google.com ([209.85.216.45]:46939) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n4b3a-00013j-N7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 23:04:20 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pj1-f45.google.com with SMTP id rj2-20020a17090b3e8200b001b1944bad25so1762972pjb.5 for ; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 20:04:17 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KnjT6XUzwdfB7NJgKw5sIeHKJbNDLwT5kZe8uuXgg5s=; b=NvYkckpeEgzbm46BBmHkrABYtu3lhgIreGoFokxxfHjikacbxEqAyG9JpgWAIhyakF LoY6dR7YbTQLUYwhc0LRRK4Sb1x/HWLM485zvQBZ7i0/acFJwRp+up/k9AGc/wWSARde LR0W4DCcb71dgZV6ZKAmDazwkmRJTxm4cDs0myzTzw2Obl0gFnHePVa1HwBM/hA85R1A i9nVdjM3d25J/tGE36Udw2jn0fi9ANRdykz6m09AnPNXflx0vHjDK1av5tXcjiR+u42j DECncu3boYOSVUj0VR8SBk7qVzRQQ1IZ68EQxJExOXG9Lo9TE+2H9vxC5m9s72ROk9Ip zYFg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532q1XiDQQreh9nUVeU/x2IRYCIJ/hhSVIV7QzZ0/vmscobiVPFG aCx+BnpkWI/x632fG8RQXsDs4QD0xizXAUSeMM8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyHZycV7dbGr+/2XxY28b5unUoFSCrumgjF5kmKzLCa+8zyAOWVCrK00mbqES2BPw18vELNQPoUSCE5C5dS6hA= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1646:: with SMTP id il6mr58447284pjb.143.1641269056298; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 20:04:16 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Mon, 3 Jan 2022 23:04:15 -0500 In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.216.45; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-pj1-f45.google.com X-Spam_score_int: 5 X-Spam_score: 0.5 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (0.5 / 5.0 requ) FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:284119 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> ".github" and ".travis.yml" only makes sense in relation to >> proprietary software, so I think arguably they are harmful. > > Fair enough. BTW, I don't think you commented on test files, or did I miss it? I think we should skip test files for the same reason as for the license file. > Someone=E2=84=A2 could document it Somewhere=E2=84=A2, indeed. > Probably in the part of the README that discusses the `:ignored-files`. I happen to know that Someone=E2=84=A2 is writing up a patch and will commi= t it Somewhere=E2=84=A2 later.