From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "If you're still seeing problems, please reopen." [Was: bug#25148:] Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 15:46:20 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20191117113054.49837.qmail@mail.muc.de> <87pnhq7mxg.fsf@gnus.org> <87bltaz9g4.fsf@telefonica.net> <834kz25qp9.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2wexsv1.fsf@telefonica.net> <83sgmm4a08.fsf@gnu.org> <87h832xqxr.fsf@telefonica.net> <20191117192558.GC11551@ACM> <87a78uxot6.fsf@telefonica.net> <87a78uuvde.fsf@gnus.org> <83imni44v3.fsf@gnu.org> <83h83150ji.fsf@gnu.org> <6bd2589e-0d34-42cd-2493-06bc93038f04@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="129936"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= , Eli Zaretskii , Lars Ingebrigtsen , Toon Claes , Emacs developers To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 18 15:47:03 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iWiIw-000XcW-Iv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 15:47:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35092 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iWiIv-0000XS-38 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 09:47:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59928) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iWiIi-0000XE-Id for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 09:46:49 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iWiIb-0007O9-Kk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 09:46:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pl1-f194.google.com ([209.85.214.194]:39957) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iWiIT-0007KS-Vn; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 09:46:34 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pl1-f194.google.com with SMTP id e3so9925678plt.7; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 06:46:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9Dkmb2Z3/Y7pOKkQjDPPMglkfE/lKtjoLsRidaRRMYk=; b=J9t2ChnpVVR8zXmXYNiw6t20YhqVj+vShj0lKuHBIH8jfSdMI6CwvvzrQEvY3dBjCz mD+Umn3G7KLH9mCs+LFhPndCgrjf6AaiMRWTwH8TXLHvBDZ0Lm81tOazXmuveYSIFExF djGWXWll5OujeiAGbn9yI0MkbnzI4f0nHHP9knrktrWZo1emNv0v4vPkdqVE6OSHAH1d EvtqXJ6O9UD+g1uvsVs9HzzXQlOTjxUSefrgoi8bwNqbDSDt6v/zKPH2+hRuPyuBs863 nEHr4qvxV6v2f3LJc9LbSXQ74Xuxfm0w7pyT+5wbOExaL19IgIHf+6NYF6aHnI3xOqZG zSSQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXiRPGNyP+dvW1qpU1N+1tyE8xyQo+eSlBuVRe6u67cLJX7YuKq w2SnAXN4TP3CuXxlaIRzQ492P2JLHt4Rs1RZB3w= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzwD1sJxGyNHqF5vPDlyLj8bL7TdgChO8Kj2FJ54hIk1nYqUflhmqUoT73X9YhdnAsq5YKaOz0o9DViB2H60gY= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8b8b:: with SMTP id ay11mr26604846plb.251.1574088392374; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 06:46:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <6bd2589e-0d34-42cd-2493-06bc93038f04@yandex.ru> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.214.194 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:242369 Archived-At: Dmitry Gutov writes: > OK, I found the report we filed back then: > https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues/28152 (Adding Toon Claes to Cc as the submitter of that issue.) >From reading that page, there doesn't seem to be much progress here. Does anyone know if any of this is being worked on? Also, regarding some of the items on that list: - "Diff mailing list" -- I thought this was just a commit hook run on the server. Can't we just add that commit hook to the repository manually, whether or not Gitlab adds support for it or not? - "Integration with debbugs" -- should probably be named "Migration from debbugs". - "Emacs frontend for bug tracker" -- is something we want, but I don't see why we should ask Gitlab developers to work on it. Most likely we'll have better success adapting debbugs ourselves as has already been suggested in this thread. Best regards, Stefan Kangas