From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11113: 23.3; Access to the mini-buffer in auctex mode triggers window resize in KDE (Kwin) Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2024 07:43:45 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87frtneedk.fsf@yahoo.com> <87bk4bedzc.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24612"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 11113@debbugs.gnu.org, thomas.luebking@gmail.com, Tristan Miller , Jorge Adriano Branco Aires To: Po Lu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 09 13:46:08 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sGGzv-0006FK-UM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2024 13:46:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sGGzf-0006gk-1T; Sun, 09 Jun 2024 07:45:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sGGza-0006g4-36 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2024 07:45:46 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sGGzZ-0004Kp-RK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2024 07:45:45 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sGGzq-0005ji-4S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2024 07:46:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2024 11:46:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11113 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 11113-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11113.171793351021926 (code B ref 11113); Sun, 09 Jun 2024 11:46:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11113) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jun 2024 11:45:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33047 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sGGyz-0005ha-OM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2024 07:45:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ed1-f53.google.com ([209.85.208.53]:49159) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sGGyy-0005hH-77 for 11113@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2024 07:45:08 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ed1-f53.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-57a4d7ba501so4440679a12.2 for <11113@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 09 Jun 2024 04:44:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1717933426; x=1718538226; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=FAwJ0ulo+wteyKaggzja5ynLPMJeAnKsDxcts4lO4jg=; b=SDOEkC6wxQocRxNYHEm7aij53ITtaggcun26NOaEmQs/Z7jXPZXcd2/e7fTjRZQwhe wHRVZMljUfryj71OaHPPoGId4zlhEmYwBHBCoNKZI9KuHAGsP0ZgzYZpoGiSl/Q2JrqL FNDqtpQezBvp0LSVC3plXUJE62m1CC9fN6yOG9/i/x6E+D8jo0XbAkiSz0Qi8W6zLNyn Ay0bivQ1ChVOQcLSynLnk+8MkdAdiVUeQIgdHM1VcjW+jeFII/ogPZAqJh+nq58qzocW FXgPpdDGI9foEMkzTiPPTtJ+Gduwj4kQDReoau+xahDVxkQmmHm6L7r2YKQf2ndf0lzd ZKJA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1717933426; x=1718538226; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=FAwJ0ulo+wteyKaggzja5ynLPMJeAnKsDxcts4lO4jg=; b=aD7hvea8BWIIqmBJLKI5uK3idynMqyWsvjMPv+4ruEDXpFhGjAn1aAGW4EVOKp2994 q2iNUAkr4fREIdRrZPRivuedvIj8jC4irx1ptvzL4fOPHjyfSYxT4CQB0ml6JMy3WTil 755pw/dfS0TEx70O+hrcaoqxdLXNTbniUdjCZ9MPc/pXMc6MvzUXnBR8AR7uW7bqKs0d rq+cANmVg86M9iJSsl/g7SG1fYMxZFRXEoxphglTIRHQhpu9FXWnPql2eAcCoueenpSK k+g6IC+YmONXacuTgQlZ33cgtgDPrq4/kzia1wtzAZ1j5tVni5Ql7a4skW0iCziCNE19 FAmQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyRN2WtkzRVUl4nPcH113OFkAIKT06JhcgVnpdrPfqn1yPMyL5Y p3gywfVLWnT/c50umLSw7KgsUWX4jHo4IUV/11/zg6qKDrllHCM8woEWl+8xy9HhkUC+ATJkVLS GVOqdxOx//+F/JhiqCHKCcLA9J+GQPT/8 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEqYjjVNEUvA4vDF30dxLlb1PM9ewh9AjnPkVHHghWW3xidDdcxD3BaWOKXLXHJYYcNuF5fX9kxtKZAPBQpQaw= X-Received: by 2002:a50:9ea6:0:b0:57c:6740:f47c with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-57c6740f525mr2603541a12.27.1717933425602; Sun, 09 Jun 2024 04:43:45 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sun, 9 Jun 2024 07:43:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87bk4bedzc.fsf@yahoo.com> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:286930 Archived-At: [Fixed the subject here to not include Tristan's name. It was added by me on accident; sorry.] Po Lu writes: > Po Lu writes: > >> A window manager's creatively interpreting (read: failing to observe) >> geometry hints specified by a client is deficient behavior on the window >> manager's part, so the least they could have done should have been >> declining to play "shift the blame." As enforcing window management >> properties otherwise than the client requested was a KWin bug then, so >> it is now, whether they admit it or not, and until they leave their high >> pedestal Emacs users might easily circumvent it by configuring >> `frame-resize-pixelwise' to t. > > BTW, it might interest them to know that the wm-spec defines > maximization in quite express terms: > > Maximization is a very old feature of window managers. There was even > a ZoomedState in early ICCCM drafts. Maximizing a window should give > it as much of the screen area as possible (this may not be the full > -------------------------------------- > screen area, but only a smaller 'workarea', since the window manager > may have reserved certain areas for other windows). A window manager > is expected to remember the geometry of a maximized window and restore > it upon de-maximization. Modern window managers typically allow > separate horizontal and vertical maximization. > > Emphasis mine. By any reasonable interpretation, the window manager > should disregard resize increments in resizing maximized windows, and > indeed as far as I'm aware, KWin's design choices have been emulated by > no other conforming window manager. Thanks, could someone please contact them about this? Does this affect all KDE users? If so, that sounds like a pretty nasty bug. Is there any feasible workaround that we could do on our end?