From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master f8fed41 2/3: image-dired: Improve XDG compliance Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 12:24:11 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83sfwp1c27.fsf@gnu.org> <87y26hqdxy.fsf@posteo.net> <83a6ix12k8.fsf@gnu.org> <87tuh5q9dz.fsf@posteo.net> <831r490xfh.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22871"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Philip Kaludercic , Emacs developers To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 26 12:40:44 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mfJsp-0005i3-Ub for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 12:40:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47318 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mfJsn-0006Kx-H1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 06:40:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51628) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mfJd5-0003AA-DT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 06:24:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pl1-f170.google.com ([209.85.214.170]:41499) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mfJd3-0007aR-Qr; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 06:24:27 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pl1-f170.google.com with SMTP id z11so2070392plg.8; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 03:24:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=622L9x49Wr1NAoIpU/1m9qksLnZbFVN24i38/4Qei3k=; b=7U/iN1odCxPjdphZe0rOSNSCbvwA7PiGB4m0MwB4MJB9+L4iqfbrvurX6cw1f5P7Dq IfK0eBOeo9/fK0O7J4oeNB3RI5nBrbbGpkeh7ySstdOuIgIeXIH1+qni0JDiowhoHS2s b/tO2MLie2wyJDpp3dVLt+XdXZRTbKvsDBIMDjc3RssPVhP97NlVvcU71f4T83gYT9E8 nW2n0pdo+7lqDu8fBd6kJ6EeGJOLzBpMvf+K/xWWJJAVN+ClN8cXycwogSznlKO4rzG3 Qr+FUwi3tUqzzE6pV3I52O1wi2H6PochrsmB9kOydC49vILNVM8JNli7+5MOypN58t+4 to8g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531GG3po6PpJPZn22NkywRD6cz38kGTVf709Uhbx/YU6jtixfYXH 8HpLuCfgI+zsCO4ADnGea6ZhBqHp+Oe9jMi3sdvx5RPN X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxAi5DtUeNrYJ7rL3JFBwXH04UWaDBvNv5+m+czggZxJgKXnscoQsRVBpXCBQfnQ9zhWGlOr/RAmhlYIyBHk3s= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8c93:b0:141:5442:e608 with SMTP id t19-20020a1709028c9300b001415442e608mr2433006plo.32.1635243862658; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 03:24:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <831r490xfh.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.214.170; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-pl1-f170.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:277832 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > > If anything, I think XDG is becoming more and more popular since 2003, > > and I wouldn't know of any other serious contender to replace XDG. > > Yes, XDG is the current fashion. As were the ones before it. Which ones would that be?