From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New obsolete.el file for obsolete stuff? Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:01:19 +0000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27567"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 19 16:01:59 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k8Of9-000713-A9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 16:01:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53742 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k8Of8-0003RA-C9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:01:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36850) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k8OeZ-000324-AE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:01:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yb1-f179.google.com ([209.85.219.179]:40957) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k8OeX-00051T-Pi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:01:23 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-yb1-f179.google.com with SMTP id q3so13377533ybp.7 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 07:01:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Dbx1xLqbAsAiAAsinZTZy05xWzsrdcbuQ4ER1ZqyZ7s=; b=eLHsfy3hKwLjDkCnoEYRUUEGolUdim2t6REEVuJ3m8hCXuqzKVzBQOhqnMcyT3EakN 2h7PjrBFiL2RPcCukDBV+GHKDv+D67LP9LfNeWzI5iVP4EBhNd9mDMH+UOEzrxKjIfp4 7mLJosLuztKWZJQEegQe9SIJ2GC6kyv+3S1Cxxvb1LBZ/TM0fOWwo1ODQKu/Ptk8Or8q tX4Bjy4aGY7nGVZx6hRfIqwUv+USCQkGSLpz6zktVlvnPnDHBTixrDYHO/+7fmA+E1/x kjEpQZF/K5JtNwNyPeJFgH10wiBj7FQ0CNT1x1OvNlt7DelP/rbmf520BmL+q/3+HPj4 USfQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533+n0EcsNkXY7DAhPpKfDX32wOXu+a3c9oFv6PExI+sNuT0S9+y Ei3s0RsThgvFS5YU8W2cgkOV0wk/pYqS+DtoPm8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwBswnO5PuFzSBYusxXhG7HtvkE+lEaROZfPhAREQe0TDotCJFPtzdkHrIcRnK7TLTd/oGnsJj7ME1P8xaGPdk= X-Received: by 2002:a25:b290:: with SMTP id k16mr33099812ybj.389.1597845680755; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 07:01:20 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:01:19 +0000 In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.219.179; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-yb1-f179.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/08/19 10:01:20 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -8 X-Spam_score: -0.9 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:254007 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > The actual obsolete aliases definitions are usually not the main problem > (i.e. having this "cruft" mixed in ("scattered") with the normal code > doesn't do much harm if any) I sometimes find it mildly distracting to see obsolete definitions when navigating code. But this, of course, is a stylistic and highly subjective point. I just figured it was worth floating the idea to see if it would catch on, and I'm perfectly happy either way. Thanks for commenting. Best regards, Stefan Kangas