From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Relevance of `baud-rate' in the 2020s? Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 20:55:00 +0000 Message-ID: References: <833625l9wv.fsf@gnu.org> <83v9f0j00x.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8092"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 23 22:56:09 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kW46b-0001yU-Dm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 22:56:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58900 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kW46a-0006Cq-F9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 16:56:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46548) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kW45Z-0005er-4i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 16:55:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ej1-f46.google.com ([209.85.218.46]:37779) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kW45X-0000UC-6a; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 16:55:04 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ej1-f46.google.com with SMTP id p9so4192480eji.4; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 13:55:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KttbIN56SDqQcR6Dz9DtwRPF827wa1zDpxZQVMLCeT0=; b=WzUYhioxLEubXr8eVg83yBppvS9X10n0/x9Uc3Ho5NYgv1TTvhC74jHNFXaPhSaayB e45qKdEvhR9VSs6kpomP49/7PK26T3J5U1S3ZF26VDlAgkwvcyxrMsWoLfgHx9ARa12E 6p//59JhjVzecXYxNltsv8QbQAyl4gTaQJS6kxV4CW7ZpKLT2f07ZgciCYWyWkXe4CCJ pRhVbCUDt7caAxxxtmiiL029Py8guQsS8arXXxj9SN8kysZMetFV22hzO3CUHCxP19Us 5cOj16cCDSppU9kxu1FXbka3A7R/BT5nzvE2DVcmPj04jZeaSQo2ipCXKrvrM4rlRLXH 1USA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530yzHgqA7KHXVg9qmc8tKP8xqbwFW1mXN+Cb6HzkSak1cF4sO6d kWlSp5pZxiBgM4eXw2DBdn2qdaJMD2FNyq/B8MI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy2Q2eklAEWqlyxscreG/fpTkCi2g81KLGHgcb5/URQ160ShIuA//oXHI98n/rM7RALFuek+xq43dDcbuYn6rE= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1246:: with SMTP id u6mr3854077eja.432.1603486501130; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 13:55:01 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 20:55:00 +0000 In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.218.46; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-ej1-f46.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/23 16:55:01 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:258396 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > What do you think of removing `baud-rate` and replacing it with > a `low-bandwidth-mode` global minor mode? I like this idea. It would immediately make the situation much more clear. Perhaps we should add the idea to the bug tracker.