From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62751: 29.0.90; New libraries that still need to be assigned to packages Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2023 07:42:46 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87zg7fyjka.fsf@bernoul.li> <87wmwobgk6.fsf@bernoul.li> <838r93g2wm.fsf@gnu.org> <83wmwnem5u.fsf@gnu.org> <83pm2c9ev8.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16253"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: jonas@bernoul.li, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 62751@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , John Wiegley Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 23 16:44:23 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qk3rr-00041t-5a for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 23 Sep 2023 16:44:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qk3rR-0004W5-PH; Sat, 23 Sep 2023 10:43:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qk3rQ-0004Vd-0u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Sep 2023 10:43:56 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qk3rL-0007hk-Oy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Sep 2023 10:43:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qk3rW-0002tx-Ee for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Sep 2023 10:44:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2023 14:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62751 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 62751-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62751.169548019011081 (code B ref 62751); Sat, 23 Sep 2023 14:44:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62751) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Sep 2023 14:43:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40317 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qk3qf-0002se-E3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Sep 2023 10:43:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lj1-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::22d]:42233) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qk3qa-0002s6-0z for 62751@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Sep 2023 10:43:07 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lj1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2c12fc235fbso44485711fa.0 for <62751@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 23 Sep 2023 07:42:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1695480167; x=1696084967; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=AU034gmL4XlZzgLUAN8rtn9X6vjDoRHQkMmwP6QBl3E=; b=gb56mENqNLauC57KP4ZODfn69e6dNKYoa55+zNnJ3q73jmBxg4vzu4nynx3X2oBJty LahhLWirAqCL+uuGwgPH8cpRN2XhcP0ABV18kxhyVyGfU0WTNoIjvk6FR4QNKTTpprWD qbWah9nAyRvhe1r5YFpkMGEGXDcLeFbQ5SaFYZqKTQNEqM9ixc25dRgMubFQLatl2JZ4 6NE5K4lXTAOe+bKWJ/GT99YT2VonzpEX1sGGObj4TDl4cyMDl95VBnsOAP69tIcsY/30 zizhdxTooyC7b7KPMeO12RYnCOs791hQ6ALMRdMxe+y5xehbHQS3iJLSuK6aGj7Bo/tN BcVA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1695480167; x=1696084967; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=AU034gmL4XlZzgLUAN8rtn9X6vjDoRHQkMmwP6QBl3E=; b=MEXdPJMQ0jsjgm8l7FaKBhTz8nq4Gp0q9ufcoInlWFtjHJimpjJChaIyPIq4ocl3/L BHmuJ12aqFaluboHRtBhAJLyKsM2RUlhibx+iIW0epG02RLPfgAAULBbsqGsyOTzPvhl adim/YFhQ9liYG9cO6DoNOhk/ESmfTW9gp2ThZZQmzdvCoJmRRtXVMSWMfk60Pc8e7EF tknl8Nz9MyMaqqi4wFtaUg6vSNutt9c96LShwgEpfoxEqJHK9cCWj0z3aOGFYANCogmg Fgv1gqMmMRwRneXVKSSbZh0bpiTdOw7RVbQCClCyQXhihFlZpO0y/O9xf1uaIuUHeHel VAjw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyEOS3SR1koN1P/ZtM4W4ks03z8xkWxBiVdivpA6EELm9njIV/U Uz/T9kEbqmCEAjM3Jc3GnH05Q3c3XeQFiyyspsc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHFKPcD7BGA4nD2KB0YNtjNslivl6HdVki6jTE/Lej5ZsPb+I0CEOkJmdJApS6bM2ITBFm9P7Sa7K+BUl405eI= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:978f:0:b0:2bf:fae0:5cf9 with SMTP id y15-20020a2e978f000000b002bffae05cf9mr847609lji.15.1695480166573; Sat, 23 Sep 2023 07:42:46 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sat, 23 Sep 2023 07:42:46 -0700 In-Reply-To: <83pm2c9ev8.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:271171 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Stefan Kangas >> Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 17:15:04 -0700 >> Cc: jonas@bernoul.li, 62751@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca >> >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> >> > You mean, move bind-key.el out of lisp/use-package, right? >> >> >> >> Yes. >> > >> > Fine by me, and I think this is preferable, and even clearly TRT for a >> > package that is not limited to its parent package. >> >> Do you see any reason why that change would be dangerous, or could we do >> it on the release branch? > > I honestly don't know. Maybe we should ask the users of use-package? > > John, do you see any potential problems with that? We can probably get away with the more minimal change I installed on emacs-29 yesterday. The only downside of not moving the file there, as far as I can tell, is that it will be a hassle if we need to merge any changes in bind-key.el to master. It's a very slow moving target though, so those instances should hopefully be rare. Should bind-key.el be in lisp/? lisp/emacs-lisp/?