From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Our use of the "fixed" tag in debbugs Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 13:16:59 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83zgrjyd6i.fsf@gnu.org> <87o87zkagg.fsf@tcd.ie> <874k9r1p7j.fsf@tcd.ie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11459"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Basil L. Contovounesios" , Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 08 19:17:53 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mYtVI-0002iS-Jb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 08 Oct 2021 19:17:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55078 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mYtVH-0006kX-ID for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 08 Oct 2021 13:17:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58684) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mYtUW-0005Ou-BA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Oct 2021 13:17:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pl1-f175.google.com ([209.85.214.175]:33636) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mYtUU-00077X-IG; Fri, 08 Oct 2021 13:17:04 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pl1-f175.google.com with SMTP id a11so6642846plm.0; Fri, 08 Oct 2021 10:17:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1zYjS8YXazVC5h3EjGly9ye4I2njThzFuBAgLrM7X5g=; b=77O6nPqV/NZzBH/aM5hOSJ8oKGNaVZ/qwM+ZerVYAgRfMo/NYUltfED23H/Z433SLK 5JfknPYIqUu7Arqhn0tRFrQa0fUDReeiJUUVjChlkO5ckstHqbj8xR6EO9NVpoK0zpRV Cfia1MipxIK7ahi2r4IFiCbcHITMITFudkiDuJ0voiMbcZAEa1H+uX/Hl/kygvjEkTOj tDNU72nKg/cqK6wgVtdJWz2LtYsfDZRAmWWNfe3ZxkMHTNcgQJU8BN9eSuIzXtKHrUCe +XVUhrsq+qpeatwYLQT3GO7wCU4jEr6WfBhJ3GBrYH9QYMxH9S0wm8MR9lOISC5PaTtj fK/Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532e+y9CfY4HczlRI9odDFrQUU0yeiFlDxOBMNhp261gDJMwgK7t I1Wdfp00c7GAdLpb0loiiXtYyuFlgZCdx1AdFsQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx3YarBlMhPqZNOw2gq0uJ8RG1+yxytN1SFjhBLKkjyVAbJwBNVE2OgqU/pS56vswQj0j94/tDn6dwfCnRYhW8= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:460a:: with SMTP id w10mr13638275pjg.132.1633713420326; Fri, 08 Oct 2021 10:17:00 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 13:16:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: <874k9r1p7j.fsf@tcd.ie> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.214.175; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-pl1-f175.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:276569 Archived-At: "Basil L. Contovounesios" writes: > I looked earlier but couldn't find the one I was thinking of > unfortunately. My impression is that I closed the bug somehow, received > an email acknowledging that I'd closed it, but on bugs.gnu.org it didn't > say "Done". Perhaps you're right and I misunderstood at the time or am > misremembering. I have managed to confuse myself in the past by looking at a bug report to soon, before debbugs has had time to process it. Other times, I have visited the page, but actually saw an old cached version, and had to manually reload the page to see that the bug was closed. I don't know if this always happens, or if that was just an exception, because I now habitually reload the page to make sure I am always looking at the latest version.