From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 0161c9d 1/2: Load all generic-x.el modes unconditionally Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:22:55 -0600 Message-ID: References: <20210209160550.18823.10795@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20210209160551.832FB20AD1@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87o8gti2ln.fsf@gnus.org> <83sg65jffx.fsf@gnu.org> <83im71j96z.fsf@gnu.org> <83czx8k3gn.fsf@gnu.org> <83sg64hqzj.fsf@gnu.org> <83im6zj1bo.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13092"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Matt Armstrong , Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 11 15:28:18 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lACx7-0003Iz-OP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 15:28:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54728 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lACx5-0006Oy-0W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 09:28:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58436) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lACs4-00005D-GP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 09:23:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pg1-f176.google.com ([209.85.215.176]:34551) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lACrz-0001vj-KM; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 09:23:03 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pg1-f176.google.com with SMTP id o7so3989315pgl.1; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 06:22:57 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=H90k1jlSAeVGEexd8s8QFKOC5BYraRWOV8IyZTvqSNI=; b=WURpvcfIcNoM0ujtGBnbBQuBW2TSvbASecsHp9eVvpmxQE0nUDCIX9zZT/R+KxRPoL uDa8vdEl3YhMO6CyPZB2lNQMw8ci8rFZLG/CB4ZH1w+BsD7SjZaAQhapMgaX9DyIvCst vT3IMWScJTBqpLJBjAOnolRQ58K8fkhcHXqADLXgUBKoJ7293BcYy7iwE8CFyc4FPeGe Dyqz/iRG6G8Ka+JZ3WsPrVJQQLCQqjaZZNedodi7QioDsmlWOlyR9C1B2A9r/Plub4sy UsH/WkIt02a4evuA/HBO48A5TJasAliOoU+Aq+9QPclvo3gCHFqEx1EvWud1PFaGVtjL Nw7w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531COURizR+WzqOGMbqMQxIFgooKW8jTxbIcyVlOzM155tYZwJk3 PorEwD+XSO3tUNSFe6IIJuDXR/C3B+e8muLbsJI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJypmD20klfAaZMkDSmyl8yPlB+sK1XbwWBGwyMYh3t0WhIQFbPpOHot3LoHEayBTIqloucE4q9BHjPkkOqLQbY= X-Received: by 2002:a62:d453:0:b029:1d6:587b:5d31 with SMTP id u19-20020a62d4530000b02901d6587b5d31mr7928816pfl.58.1613053376666; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 06:22:56 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:22:55 -0600 In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.215.176; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-pg1-f176.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:264379 Archived-At: Matt Armstrong writes: > Separately (almost), when looking at this I noticed that files.el > installs a mode for .Xdefaults in auto-mode-alist, and so does > generic-x.el. We should decide which is the best one and remove the other one.