From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 050b830 3/3: Do interactive mode tagging for finder.el Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 12:08:00 -0500 Message-ID: References: <83zgyzeezu.fsf@gnu.org> <87eegbo8db.fsf@gnus.org> <83v99nedze.fsf@gnu.org> <837dm3drum.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40525"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 19 18:09:40 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lNId1-000APq-NP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 18:09:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44540 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lNId0-0005fb-Pa for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 13:09:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60368) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lNIbY-0003vB-JT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 13:08:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pj1-f47.google.com ([209.85.216.47]:40882) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lNIbW-0007KF-BY; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 13:08:08 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pj1-f47.google.com with SMTP id a22-20020a17090aa516b02900c1215e9b33so7021895pjq.5; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 10:08:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ehQnxBtaNB/P4RSw48u3m6R04T5mKV4MuYulYxBvkjQ=; b=FfqWWs4bLQG9ku1eDfssQpSV4rmQBVS5egcszU+JLz1A94s3zJ+zGvcoVVMxvHQhSF 7hZHHRN98MUHh+IbJ7ADyK7pbH8D6fVsP9OvLqe0fcFFPZ5LmcHQBDarNSV8/y1V/lD8 vr7yx8l0iXNVAfcyZsTgyNdOSNLu3F3WGC5DhpPGzdm0ES8uzXXXv23O8a99ZCmOOkd/ RhMsoBbDhAhZE07RE3UVmjJfMVA6faMd2WoBVLIN4AZB7M/Y0kJl8MJ8nJtIMgur++f7 2rzftR4oQDHQwBlbPLVv+E/FWqNPsgAfutnWyfZReWKVyp7y6LKiROjDwCacWmUGTeLl bxJA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530fFBWiD09uEbdwVGYMzUnlmVb26o9B0SYuaxj4FBqIL29Nbgje wQOZxq0R1wwIfVneS5/gwcaCNrXSMaLJ6rx6/tmYVUMRip4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxYGrteg9Spga5foR74xz/3gxntxQxM0r5OvWCCuaF/w0Qb/r545o1wnIPxXMN09R5CjE31R+ERYLZZ/fXgD1U= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:f986:: with SMTP id cq6mr10744418pjb.175.1616173681334; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 10:08:01 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 12:08:00 -0500 In-Reply-To: <837dm3drum.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.216.47; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-pj1-f47.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266609 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> If the above is correct, then that also means that there is no point to >> show such commands even in `finder-mode'. So it would be even better to >> add some form that marks a command as only relevant to the mouse and >> then never show those commands in `M-x'. ISTR we discussed something >> like that but I'm not sure if we reached any conclusion. > > That's a separate issue. My point is that we shouldn't tag commands > with a mode unless we are 110% sure this tagging is correct and cannot > do any harm. If there's doubt, there's no doubt. Makes sense. I'll revert that part of the change. Should we take this opportunity to discuss the above, though? I think it would be useful to have something like it. But I don't have any great ideas for what it could look like.