From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 37889523278: Add new `swap` macro and use it Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2024 22:34:41 -0800 Message-ID: References: <170452579053.27998.16123231327386305897@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20240106072311.28B8FC0034E@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87plye9ahs.fsf@yahoo.com> <83o7dyua0d.fsf@gnu.org> <87le9297ei.fsf@yahoo.com> <87cyue92fx.fsf@yahoo.com> <877ckm8uzz.fsf@yahoo.com> <83v886sgtl.fsf@gnu.org> <83plyescg9.fsf@gnu.org> <87wmsl7wh9.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26117"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 07 07:35:09 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rMMkX-0006ZZ-Hy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 07 Jan 2024 07:35:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rMMkD-00014q-RT; Sun, 07 Jan 2024 01:34:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rMMkB-00014e-5L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jan 2024 01:34:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lf1-x12e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::12e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rMMk8-0002Dq-S7; Sun, 07 Jan 2024 01:34:46 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lf1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-50e6ee8e911so839270e87.1; Sat, 06 Jan 2024 22:34:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1704609282; x=1705214082; darn=gnu.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=rhaCNgLCcGMTzjl6DFKfBQlDROIOv9mSpm6Ne40LK6s=; b=N7tMzGXqJGmnlR2pY5DWDo5/gcI9dLouk3UtySVGgSxZ32RGqkD3iiJREwILiIIkTg fPsilzk6PJcxEj5Ot9goTufTy/5wZVXLYwjjkM96dr4OjWk1QahbVNAoXfHfANs4W8pb V+9U3Y38gflTmHaeyHeAGJaYnU2NrWFTiITz3o1BNKzsWJo4A3XHtz5H3gTSPlLJJSJT JpFkwu0Fw0OmKnjwJllz0RjfTuUZuM4OzhWUSLfNWjnGzUZks/5Ym/ddMk0P/kshWkGo ghfQ92vD525bj2QayFtbyZZBGh9ZZgA3ekpnqGeAgXyGz9fc3FFSRzdtHJyvmvmQtPaC mhWg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704609282; x=1705214082; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=rhaCNgLCcGMTzjl6DFKfBQlDROIOv9mSpm6Ne40LK6s=; b=Nc87ZnueNtbIswazfdkLNVMD9tRdTPFFI82Ea7k9/4Q+UIp79Pvy2M8VWr3OJSj3Gl GtMFxW8jF5pAc0PBX5OWIp4AEdPf36NQL/5ufY3NXqGxTnn0NWAXyD+3B1StxPqQbgH4 Byfes8qpGCdyUTpN4yBcoczg4j5BUufMOF+xEbFQs5l1630I6rRqT2cEg0ege/tCObrx 3IuahEyn2VUqvPrRip+1ho8p+N4RcClORj+m4RbSafE9f6xutY9xHHrneZDYwMYUHXF9 4v3hlm8fTiebYohqmSh2cNeD8kcd1HrJmN+mI6z+8JrTFRbhAaEhCB935lF8muSBohnt S2YQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx4iXxcZbn2KuJ0nTPHzHBMAyJZcdSn20exmL8ovFkbeX1D2qdk yzGyPeJg33p7iQxPuObsCpmHzrCg/GR9+H9hZsg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGRvNCsH+t/gikU0TGSFiWwGe8byn7ROIV1Q/3krRjoCyD2EPqlRqWFfq2vJnY7D34SvhSl48HM4X+ddTtyfT0= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:791:b0:50e:3084:4ac7 with SMTP id x17-20020a056512079100b0050e30844ac7mr619118lfr.53.1704609282182; Sat, 06 Jan 2024 22:34:42 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sat, 6 Jan 2024 22:34:41 -0800 In-Reply-To: <87wmsl7wh9.fsf@yahoo.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::12e; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-lf1-x12e.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:314666 Archived-At: Po Lu writes: > Eli Zaretskii writes: > >> Then you could have easily fixed the change instead of reverting it, >> right? Why didn't you? > > Because the change cannot be fixed in such a way that all affected > systems will correctly build Emacs, and is impossible to implement in C. That is a serious objection if it is true. But nothing approaching that has been shown to be true so far, not in this thread at any rate.