Re: The xwidget branch origin story

[Michael Abrahams <miabraha@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1299 bytes --]

One more, el-widgets

On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 2:19 PM, <joakim@verona.se> wrote:

> Michael Abrahams <miabraha@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > ewidgets, egtk, gtk-widgets, emacs-widgets, elisp-widgets, elisp-gtk,
> elisp-gtkw
>
> While there is  currently only an gtk implementation of xwidgets
> available, gtk is not supposed to be a hard limitation. Therefore I would
> like the
> name to not include gtk.
>
> That leaves, from the above suggestions:
>
> ewidgets, emacs-widgets, elisp-widgets
>
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 8:56 AM, <joakim@verona.se> wrote:
> >
> >
> >  John Wiegley <jwiegley@gmail.com> writes:
> >
> >  >>>>>> Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes:
> >  >
> >  >> Since `xwidget' is misleading people, and the `x' doesn't help in
> any way,
> >  >> please just rename it. But we also already have Emacs code concerning
> >  >> widgets, so maybe try to come up with a name that is specific to
> these
> >  >> particular widgets or their use.
> >  >
> >  > Even ewidgets would be better.
> >
> >  I can rename the feature and the right time would be now before merging
> >  it to master.
> >
> >  But since I obviously fail at coming up with good names, I need some
> >  help. John?
> >
> >  >
> >  > John
> >  >
> >
> >  --
> >  Joakim Verona
> >
> >
>
> --
> Joakim Verona
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2226 bytes --]