From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: oslsachem Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8562: Emacs 23.1 and later don't work in windows 98 Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 01:05:53 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83d3k88k6o.fsf@gnu.org> <83wri4kpwb.fsf@gnu.org> <83d3j9e2pn.fsf@gnu.org> <8339k3esws.fsf@gnu.org> <83wrhed91s.fsf@gnu.org> <838vtscbeu.fsf@gnu.org> <83vcwvc1eq.fsf@gnu.org> <83vcwsf2ra.fsf@gnu.org> <83k4d6fuph.fsf@gnu.org> <83pqmve2s2.fsf@gnu.org> <837h92dqai.fsf@gnu.org> <83r579c6wn.fsf@gnu.org> <8362ohcrht.fsf@gnu.org> <83d3ehc6oe.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1319670388 24607 80.91.229.12 (26 Oct 2011 23:06:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 23:06:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8562@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 27 01:06:24 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RJCY9-0005V5-TW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 01:06:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46195 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJCY9-0007pt-8D for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:06:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:39016) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJCY6-0007pd-OX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:06:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJCY5-0001Hn-Fr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:06:18 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:56148) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJCY5-0001Hj-D3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:06:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RJCZm-0002oX-BL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:08:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: oslsachem Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 23:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8562 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8562-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8562.131967046610790 (code B ref 8562); Wed, 26 Oct 2011 23:08:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8562) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Oct 2011 23:07:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RJCZW-0002nz-NT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:07:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com ([209.85.161.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RJCZU-0002nm-EH for 8562@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:07:45 -0400 Original-Received: by faas12 with SMTP id s12so2068605faa.3 for <8562@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:05:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mODLKQkxdpYj5OfavOXBV85e5isKee0A1qBcYIH8Afk=; b=Gz6GXwuLstredU2mKQjz+ol7BXUyMJngF4hN3aFCatKBy/zPBrCFHaIjAucU7HRo5u CtQNs6KBmmrLNbG+SSETi0LKfGQgcRtiO/3eZ3+hQs5S9sTlApykuox/gCk3fxI84BXZ hCSfBe/2AVrsvMPXSsy0v6UVbhhDpgs7FFmJU= Original-Received: by 10.223.85.139 with SMTP id o11mr62351628fal.0.1319670353412; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:05:53 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.223.115.197 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:05:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83d3ehc6oe.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:08:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:53182 Archived-At: > I would like to avoid making changes for which we don't have a good > reason and a clear test case. =A0So if you can spot any significant > differences in menus depending on whether AppendMenuW comes from > unicows.dll or elsewhere, please show them, and let's take it from > there. =A0If there are no significant differences, I'd prefer not to > rock the boat more than necessary. Indeed, I couldn't tell any difference between them. Come to think of it, I can't but agree with you. It seems a good example of "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" or "never change a running system" :) Greetings, Osl