On 19 February 2016 at 01:21, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:

>
> > If my vote counts, it's obviously "off".
>
> In general, or because you thought replacement commands fold
> characters?
>

Because I thought replacement was affected.


> In this message:
>
>   http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2016-02/msg00245.html
>
> you expressed a different opinion:
>
>   I'm not even suggesting that this kind of comparisons should not be
>   the default, even. Especially given the fact that locale-dependent
>   comparators are not very well supported in Emacs at the moment.
>
> This seems to be mildly in favor of the feature being on by default,
> or maybe I misunderstand what you wanted to say here.


That is correct. I was, mildly in favour, as long as it's limited to
interactive search commands.

As I have read the rest of the discussion, I have shifted slightly toward
the negative end of the spectrum to the point that my opinion is "off" by
default right now, until locale-aware searching is available in Emacs.

I'm a firm believer of putting one's money where one's mouth is, and I'm
willing to work on it myself. However, right now I'm limited by the fact
that I have no copyright assignment on file, so you can't merge anything I
do. I have to bring this up with my employer's legal department again.

Regards,
Elias