Also want to highlight some noticeable features in the comparison pic:

   1.

   Static variables and functions are highlighted differently.
   2.

   Constant variables are highlighted differently.
   3.

   Not only the declaration, but the usages are highlighted also.
   4.

   Package is highlighted correctly.

[image: Post image]

On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 5:09 PM Anand Tamariya <atamariya@gmail.com> wrote:

> I've been working on Semantic font-lock for Java using CEDET Semantic
> infrastructure which uses Wisent incremental parsing under the hood. So far
> the results look promising. Hence I'm sharing the same.
> [image: Post image]
> <https://preview.redd.it/poxkw6o7a4c41.png?width=849&format=png&auto=webp&s=a6f6e973f7e555eea1b87edd942c733db2340957>
>
> It uses following face definitions for highlighting.
>
> (defvar semantic-format-face-alist
>   `( (function . font-lock-function-name-face)
>      (variable . font-lock-variable-name-face)
>      (type . font-lock-type-face)
>      ;; These are different between Emacsen.
>      (include . ,'font-lock-constant-face)
>      (package . , 'font-lock-constant-face)
>      ;; Not a tag, but instead a feature of output
>      (label . font-lock-string-face)
>      (comment . font-lock-comment-face)
>      (keyword . font-lock-keyword-face)
>      (annotation . font-lock-builtin-face)
>      (constant . bold)
>      ;;(member . font-lock-member-face)
>      (abstract . italic)
>      (static . italic)
>      (documentation . font-lock-doc-face)
>      )
>
> *Code:* Emacs customization (https://gitlab.com/atamariya/emacs/tree/dev)
>