From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Per_Starb=E4ck?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: where-is only mentions first key in interval Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:19:24 +0100 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1329146388 25918 80.91.229.3 (13 Feb 2012 15:19:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:19:48 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 13 16:19:47 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rwxgp-00021f-Rx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:19:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53512 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rwxgp-00079E-7o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:19:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42556) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rwxgl-00078n-N6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:19:36 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rwxgc-0004oQ-5I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:19:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:51718) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rwxgc-0004nt-0y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:19:26 -0500 Original-Received: by wera13 with SMTP id a13so4404024wer.0 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:19:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=YRHvJzEeKpWTpT+B7KLTVX4MPwObokudt/bTFnARlbM=; b=FwYy6D2uwQnau0lVn8EjXVlk6ow0KWOnD2cmTqBhmTMhl5mBURJpKwhZY1K967Z48d hjwUb3JQW7vvEFoQ+vGauvtkiAux8DcFCD7nBJCsxPkg6pShS4Ui9mt/Xsyd5qeHesiF nkEAHv7R/mcMtSXUXhyzs4Rn7PPNpsBCrP9As= Original-Received: by 10.181.11.231 with SMTP id el7mr15010619wid.0.1329146364587; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:19:24 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.223.126.82 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:19:24 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Sender-Auth: K_PeGdOS2-8OLRB2K3xkqIf7QVM X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 74.125.82.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:148550 Archived-At: I did C-h w dired-find-file in dired and was surprised that the answer dired-find-file is on RET, e, didn't include 'f' which also is bound to dired-find-file. It's because 'e' and 'f' come directly after each other. 'where-is-internal' returns ([13] [(101 . 102)] [menu-bar immediate find-file]) which includes the interval e..f (101..102), and then 'where-is' maps 'key-description' on that, and (key-description [(101 . 102)]) returns just "e". Is this a bug or just a misfeature? With Emacs 22.3 the answer is instead the better dired-find-file is on f, e, ; its alias dired-advertised-find-file is on RET but from Emacs 23 'f' is no longer mentioned. (That includes current 23.4 and current pretest 24.0.93.