From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "T.V. Raman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: insert-char and post-self-insert-hook Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 08:33:35 -0800 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1359045227 11294 80.91.229.3 (24 Jan 2013 16:33:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:33:47 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 24 17:34:07 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TyPkZ-0002Mv-S0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:34:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46755 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TyPkI-000696-CX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 11:33:46 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33761) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TyPkD-00067p-Oa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 11:33:44 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TyPk8-0006Gd-Mf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 11:33:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-vb0-f49.google.com ([209.85.212.49]:58561) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TyPk8-0006GW-IZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 11:33:36 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-vb0-f49.google.com with SMTP id s24so7286347vbi.22 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 08:33:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=U6K4gvJJCvQdEDha/qZMAbg0QAmb5EgU2wZwGbakESA=; b=JgncvTrimltI1sIFF8I6PQvahveqo/+R6bEZQnfLPdBLKpodA/HUcu9KpZX4KxwVLr Ai8EMe1aylLbmJVoG7KX4lrshP/kHXehqazhylbOk/Pe+z8ujqjxfkFs4Fv/PuorjSui aKRV1Gs2CRx2nI17aFDW5Ln7WpnQ+SLezjMbVAdyAYVQD4QgCABZgkbcPbjnXRvU7NAG imfh+SOYJKqkhxxhO1pBWNUNsCo7iZBKQkF5jkBoRCgMH1mLs8jCbNqPs8ZOAi5y3ucB kEiT/1zqcCKuZEBg/efRUBxJEiO47ecVThbPqwUdYs64UnGxPEpaN5t0dsu6mOTVLZ1B kuLw== X-Received: by 10.52.69.229 with SMTP id h5mr2227962vdu.127.1359045215868; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 08:33:35 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.58.38.42 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 08:33:35 -0800 (PST) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.212.49 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:156617 Archived-At: Q: Should insert-char call post-self-insert-hook (doesn't at present) to be mutually consistent with self-insert-char -- reasoning: At least when used for inserting unicode chars via C-x8RET the end-user behavior of insert-char is very similar to self-insert-command -- --