From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "T.V. Raman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Info: Console Vs GUI difference? Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 08:38:39 -0800 Message-ID: References: <83eh70as37.fsf@gnu.org> <837gcrc10q.fsf@gnu.org> <52769DD6.1040002@poczta.onet.pl> <87habsx3o3.fsf@dpaduchikh.invalid> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1383583278 13866 80.91.229.3 (4 Nov 2013 16:41:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 16:41:18 +0000 (UTC) To: Dmitri Paduchikh , Jarek Czekalski , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 04 17:41:23 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VdNAq-0006IH-VE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 17:38:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50894 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VdNAq-0003su-KN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 11:38:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54066) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VdNAn-0003sp-JV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 11:38:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VdNAm-0008Vm-DJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 11:38:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ob0-x232.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c01::232]:44592) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VdNAm-0008VU-8N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 11:38:40 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ob0-f178.google.com with SMTP id wm4so7404833obc.9 for ; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 08:38:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=TLxRGoTu0Xcw8/LK6zDb3TLo4Xl9SogYmoDXBbwQZK0=; b=qqkSpguYfNMuvGorpA6m6WKJVpeE3eUqb5cfhM6mfHB8FhRQ6bkOGtzUfuXC4W/7YC rSaHjWI4s3auzsIW/UWxxK59acqqno7bDgvOWtQyQb2cIk0J7uWNLTcRADPqm0AdwwFb EzjW2cIwrBbPPL3BixNa37CsZJ7b2yP8qlHHHvbAOPd4vOE7HkV3l4nJBYi50Fs7rPRH LLY28O+L7+HcFz57fVsI2UA6wBxe4p7RycXeiYjXj4fYLlCF7eQMSl/W24pnHddaF5yl pIhsD8PaIzn9KuVh4qBdRjDyAilXIR+TfnBLMHA1OY8+wGT9g0uub/CVtwKicuaHNN7F ruig== X-Received: by 10.60.44.178 with SMTP id f18mr2672100oem.43.1383583119412; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 08:38:39 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.182.33.229 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 08:38:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87habsx3o3.fsf@dpaduchikh.invalid> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c01::232 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:164930 Archived-At: Thanks to all who helped -- from Emacspeak's point of view, I consider this issue closed -- setq on command-error-function works -- and emacspeak is now able to output the feedback it needs to without advising signal in emacsuns where command-error-function is available. -- -- On 11/3/13, Dmitri Paduchikh wrote: > T.V. Raman wrote: > >> It doesn't work with the recommended means of using add-function >> -- so perhaps there is a bug in nadvice > > If I understood right, add-function cannot be applied to variables > having nil values. The initial value must be a function. Though I did > not check the development version of Emacs. > > -- > With best regards > Dmitri Paduchikh >