From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Eugene J." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24583: Xpra compatibility Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 11:43:04 +0300 Message-ID: References: <57F00546.5000007@gmx.at> <57F0C565.6070209@gmx.at> <57F0D2CF.5080702@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c1924feb00bf5053df1ee48 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1475521559 2233 195.159.176.226 (3 Oct 2016 19:05:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 19:05:59 +0000 (UTC) To: martin rudalics , 24583@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 03 21:05:55 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1br8Yc-0007Zl-AX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 21:05:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38755 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1br8Ya-0001fn-QN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 15:05:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43491) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1br8W4-00080y-0N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 15:03:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1br8Vy-000390-Tg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 15:03:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:37128) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1br8Vy-00038s-QJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 15:03:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1br8Vy-0003l2-E3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 15:03:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Eugene J." Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2016 19:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24583 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 24583-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24583.147552133014340 (code B ref 24583); Mon, 03 Oct 2016 19:03:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24583) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Oct 2016 19:02:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43318 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1br8V8-0003jE-IT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 15:02:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ua0-f178.google.com ([209.85.217.178]:36084) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bqyq5-0003KH-W0 for 24583@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 04:43:10 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ua0-f178.google.com with SMTP id n13so144181424uaa.3 for <24583@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 01:43:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=7+u91etjd8w+WCwcc9qfhsHQMGVl4ZpBTsRyTOkZLJk=; b=k+4eMvJ5NzQdh0DSR4OxjtXPv5Mk1wn4nVN9EDvDDGwh3U1tSOnCCEPC65zukBw0Es hafnCxkgIeZTjkojD6OFHga++EheVQAxpFWQuOkvL+5MBh99dvIqveNFUg5Fk2BKizlq 322Ky8YvVBt1REKdo+hgPaP0nBx4YnPLU7PW3uOOTC9kfPJlcVBkFeFfN8UnkoNoVQ7G +o8CUFSPihbTUb02A1tcAxTvGCB6E7uRFrlNshC8i6H7oLMVkI5HAAhv2n92zoLyO2R5 r0gMoJAi0uoPa3RHoXduGNKV/4sXj2PxosXQiOJfDkUQU1C9knl/lJWLrLS+JsHSO6TD a8iA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=7+u91etjd8w+WCwcc9qfhsHQMGVl4ZpBTsRyTOkZLJk=; b=OWFvYNe7jH9KcZHgHLnF1zK2yKbiFbEVg/x62t+adtF370QVGBXILCo/qENcx7AnYR TcSCCeCQiMCL6ckkTZ32dwDGQ3xJJ/VMvw5ivKdAKne5BxjO6BWytQqYByDBay3w/jlo +48avE37pYx5rqIYtQ8PaOJtrtcPg3VfKXk06PUTFFg8pIroZGwAYyWCWoE8hQtjQGRV tgSO8drKzMFF90hxn5XnWHklkbKrDu3HKyo9sPAYSKlNBwNWmjsV7jyY49xhKf+1CidL McRg7N1WaKNt1N8O1Z3K/phOo4VQMlDV0u3mQKdIbJMP920D5Q7e4zcdzocUBhUxKgKp FQFA== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RkJx4Yn0fFJKLnaVELsrVanykBbz9HZLSu7d9FFUlnIlsQq2TgBPmh/89HmVBwncptNqsYjvm7OanrhsQ== X-Received: by 10.176.81.123 with SMTP id f56mr12737171uaa.23.1475484184479; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 01:43:04 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.159.55.233 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 01:43:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <57F0D2CF.5080702@gmx.at> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 03 Oct 2016 15:02:09 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:123978 Archived-At: --94eb2c1924feb00bf5053df1ee48 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > But existing frames do, correct? yes. When I set =E2=80=98frame-resize-pixelwise=E2=80=99 to t only newly c= reated frames work properly. > What happens when you explicitly call =E2=80=98x-wm-set-size-hint=E2=80= =99 for such an >existing frame? After having customized =E2=80=98frame-resize-pixelwise= =E2=80=99 to t, >obviously. The frame magically starts to resize properly O_O On 2 October 2016 at 12:26, martin rudalics wrote: > Please do CC to 24583@debbugs.gnu.org as I asked before. This might be > of interest for other people as well. > > > Yes new frame doesn't glitch. > > But existing frames do, correct? > > What happens when you explicitly call =E2=80=98x-wm-set-size-hint=E2=80= =99 for such an > existing frame? After having customized =E2=80=98frame-resize-pixelwise= =E2=80=99 to t, > obviously. > > martin > > --94eb2c1924feb00bf5053df1ee48 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>=C2=A0But existing fr= ames do, correct?
yes. When I s= et=C2=A0=C2=A0=E2=80=98frame-resize-pixelwise=E2=80=99 to t=C2=A0only newly created frames work properly.= =C2=A0

<= div>> What happens when you explicitly = call =E2=80=98x-wm-set-size-hint=E2=80=99 for such an
>existing frame?=C2=A0 = After having customized =E2=80=98frame-resize-pixelwise=E2=80=99 to t,
>obvio= usly.
The fram= e magically starts to resize properly O_O

On 2 October 2016 at 12:26, martin rudali= cs <rudalics@gmx.at> wrote:
= Please do CC to = 24583@debbugs.gnu.org as I asked before.=C2=A0 This might be
of interest for other people as well.

> Yes new frame doesn't glitch.

 But existing frames do, correct?

What happens when you explicitly call =E2=80=98x-wm-set-size-hint=E2=80=99 = for such an
existing frame?=C2=A0 After having customized =E2=80=98frame-resize-pixelwi= se=E2=80=99 to t,
obviously.

martin


--94eb2c1924feb00bf5053df1ee48--