From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Radon Rosborough Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixing package-initialize, adding early init file Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 15:13:08 -0700 Message-ID: References: <83po9vos4z.fsf@gnu.org> <87shelv2m6.fsf@udel.edu> <83vajgh4xe.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1508969698 28740 195.159.176.226 (25 Oct 2017 22:14:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 22:14:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 26 00:14:53 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e7Twc-0005JZ-Ve for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:14:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50190 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e7Twk-0000t0-Be for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 18:14:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47395) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e7Tvs-0000rT-7D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 18:13:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e7Tvr-0002sP-8d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 18:13:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lf0-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::22b]:50008) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e7Tvr-0002re-1R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 18:13:51 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lf0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id w21so1609021lfc.6 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 15:13:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5p4e8gy/ZTrSkW4VmIG/KCC5D1mL7N1fU8xgOwqY4CM=; b=vOj6biPml5Rg5flUnxZkMF2TV2v2/aC2ht4UrEkBscA/VYOX/gN9US3T4cOFeL2zWs pW5NkLEeq2QVDuv/Qq/qHheJtRcuk5DVmUBanc+e19yDxxRYfyMRDIQmKISuUe2baibt pMuoZtYVxph2/u9M7bAenQNwhRxSsjEBADN+03iTa51eKk6K/EHmL1zHNDvRdVecyeWn AG40288JpEd6jylo3VzjP+Rtg5OL3amfhovNPimun/uikpjQunDyp81HKT+2W/1jSm7D dFa4EdXOiCfiXAYQC3ImGaaa4c1oHR/TRB+qEU2ktwkCK/vtPVh8ammBdeqyJWKVK3+u OUyQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5p4e8gy/ZTrSkW4VmIG/KCC5D1mL7N1fU8xgOwqY4CM=; b=V7akKhucg80vtSwG6Ier+rb3NONeSaHoUxmTWDWM/L2EEOVbo67jegOyYav5bYlJzx zV9/O1JmBJA5gbp2VIpngQj4FgXuNW6+LAj60bPUfock3NyUDNly/dAmVfUl1fWVTEh+ b1mGFuzcwfkY7xpEAfKxtYE75rUoRw5eHTG3OPRypEzekbr4aZUty5Wg8zVpFQQMTleN mHJifBMoDP6B6NhCBsiYRFoeinyUBKlkGjMNfqX983Qr5ip+AUTQGKGhBDRKoOGayfu/ YQFnI9wN6EC7j2qG2oXVkSwT4xMFebimsBYGhTD08lB9PLw21LQ6F9Fa3t3gtCOem5MW gIYg== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaVYyxHbjkPJp3Pml/TKCjHa70VgISx1MHJh12DCv815ZfTiRu4A QtdRWch0TYjkc32kBB5JAe01NDvH94AUC7GVIbU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+SHzlm4QOHWOH6Qr6qURI7NNjwaSNaac8u9IbH0+05ZOWGBRPP52/Gl4jZR5nickZWdmhVUUntMIMEDi39dynM= X-Received: by 10.46.25.87 with SMTP id p84mr9702142lje.67.1508969629264; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 15:13:49 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.25.208.10 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 15:13:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c07::22b X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:219769 Archived-At: Sorry to be a nag, but discussion seems to have died off again. Again, is there anything I can do to help out with the process of reviewing this patch for merge? > Attached is a preliminary patch for fixing "the package-initialize > problem" (see [1] [2] [3]) by adding an early init file. Feedback > welcome. In particular, > > - do we want to try to factor out some common logic in loading the > early init file versus the regular init file? > - have I broken anything in moving the check for an invalid username > earlier in startup.el? what about moving package-initialize earlier? > - should `early-init-file' be defined in C? > - did I miss any documentation fixes? > - have I broken any style guidelines for the repository? > > Additional question: if we moved forward with this patch, would it > make it into Emacs 26.1? > > Best, > Radon Rosborough > > [1]: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2017-08/msg00154.html > [2]: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2017-08/msg00433.html > [3]: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2017-09/msg00023.html