From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Radon Rosborough Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix `early-init-file' value when file is missing Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:38:36 -0800 Message-ID: References: <8336p7zxdf.fsf@gnu.org> <83bm3mrazc.fsf@gnu.org> <837eeaosm9.fsf@gnu.org> <83pnryl38z.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005431400581abd84d" Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="47666"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: emacs-devel To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 12 06:56:43 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gtR3i-000CIq-S8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 06:56:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33802 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gtR3h-0003Hj-Ko for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 00:56:41 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56806) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gtR2I-0003Fm-9l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 00:55:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gtQms-0004vJ-BX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 00:39:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-vs1-xe42.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::e42]:44843) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gtQmq-0004mE-Qt; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 00:39:17 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-vs1-xe42.google.com with SMTP id r201so843312vsc.11; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:39:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=WVJTACCvE5GAm/pNG2DDUqIE41nh4Ts15pXSXlaG9aM=; b=AyXJowvdw7lOl+Zxw0FpuARcV63c7EV+lVW0mDkYlW+XK8LUAJ6mSrie7rS+c7BDmH kRHFAXxHFwIHrDAlN8VkTWwEsUAF/ztmr/tovEEDeqN3JsbrrMxuBwYMtTwypYnCEfH9 D9mHpNAlLj7lZrsTs+2rSk9rQn31uxNx+RO2t7YgT7dj4Deh5zLqPwHOWrLcSJ6lzI9J k6DvJ7eSAvXtWoSGr5VjWFoYkiQ2MLEVrng1wjRpa48WwSvQnmeL7nHlsjRsGOvhuELQ 16Z3+jT5hukhoNF80tC62t9rVYXNuPEMd8C6ucwivo8qUSTwO96gqD/zViFDe+Kc1+Vo 2Mqw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=WVJTACCvE5GAm/pNG2DDUqIE41nh4Ts15pXSXlaG9aM=; b=BLfZUNj3y/WpBt9IYaqccakC7rkYWYP/KrwOMO4r5h0YWUoL6TMoylEMX1uis4IZkZ BYBszywkfnc/Mjrug5bEqypjxMJJ2I+DktAEdnyQzL9Qkh1Q3rZAF/0+QgcQVvm5wERB aVxJlRcnuiPanXelh0tLvqxn8HvyHDhojaILUJ5uUX06G7R28ZQEinymxDjDFQi8TcCg qOU0ZXl3xUsMjVNtoyMQzGepes5soDmbIcsjubJ27eyfGGYvjtiSbI3Bw/yy58aUoqaP n4rXoB6n7UYtC2GgQmXQeNCFGpoQtdBRpV/aUk+6PNy7C5j6uhZnIUiOQf+chBVO76Zu 71dQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAua2vRbL0FFUUlMXD0LF1Ni1w07Go0Ug7oapBt5nWyrkNzwcL77a wDB+eFcM0FjsKhnQCfIJ0izExCPKTNNWHYDLwwbaRQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IbZcTkUa2lK9BmiDjRm6nugSYPq1TOcr4M49Gj316nEWhTsVcvP4irNl1m/27qy5xI5KaW7nhM7AdEG9MmbFno= X-Received: by 2002:a67:fb47:: with SMTP id e7mr763642vsr.167.1549949952338; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:39:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83pnryl38z.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::e42 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:233247 Archived-At: --0000000000005431400581abd84d Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > I hope we can make a more direct test. Okay, but as I mentioned in my previous message, I could amend this patch to not change the signature of `load-user-init-file' (even though the change has no logical impact whatsoever that could change user-facing behavior). Would you accept the patch if it didn't change the signature of `load-user-init-file'? Thanks, Radon --0000000000005431400581abd84d Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> I hope we can make a more direct test.

=
Okay, but as I mentioned in my previous message, I could amend this
patch to not change the signature of `load-user-init-file' (eve= n
though the change has no logical impact whatsoever that could c= hange
user-facing behavior). Would you accept the patch if it did= n't change
the signature of `load-user-init-file'?
<= br>
Thanks,
Radon

--0000000000005431400581abd84d--