From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alp Aker Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15761: Fwd: Small problem with "unmark" in *Buffer List* Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:29:48 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b86f172a86cf004e9f98425 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1383159886 15094 80.91.229.3 (30 Oct 2013 19:04:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 19:04:46 +0000 (UTC) To: 15761@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 30 20:04:50 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vbb4T-00082p-Ew for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 20:04:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53993 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vbb4S-0004Uo-Oq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 15:04:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36761) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vbb4M-0004Qf-Pq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 15:04:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vbb4J-0000e7-9G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 15:04:42 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39288) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vbb4J-0000dn-5A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 15:04:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VbaWp-0000TM-Jy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:30:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alp Aker Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 18:30:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 15761 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.13831578001781 (code B ref -1); Wed, 30 Oct 2013 18:30:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Oct 2013 18:30:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53256 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VbaWm-0000Se-3i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:30:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54858) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VbaWk-0000SR-5w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:29:58 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbaWe-0005fR-37 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:29:53 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:47591) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbaWd-0005fL-W2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:29:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56574) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbaWc-00088v-Qk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:29:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbaWb-0005ej-PO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:29:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-we0-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::236]:43746) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbaWb-0005dw-Hx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:29:49 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id t61so1720835wes.27 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:29:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=15dvbb0hs1aLtytP6HO2wNEBXvt319o23ZHB9KQ7fyM=; b=DetfttgPj/ATMOaQRpLWp5WhXmtcoPCKQdfi71JfZfaKRAs9T55FnJon4SkCuI08wi PYR43WpoLYNXWnptDH4ezVgiuzF7Adn+5TohtvXZCFRHp1InPNQ8INQwc2So3ChmdSov sRoFIoEqIgRESXdqVdKbGR3BvW8Zd8B4J2E1DDVZ+AE7Mw3C+2/G8cUBHAjVGACw6PGG dN5RgK7Y4PbzL5gTH7zeuM8nu6Zu3BFrcnzmB67/KuC4yqvexJzJ0pOsRqix/RPLAn7k FwZYqeR2LYbqe0WzVWpJxUV2STdvO/d1Qfi2V3jfwhyjM6wVzZoA+qjdhc9PTGoMTKz/ pcqQ== X-Received: by 10.194.201.225 with SMTP id kd1mr6259627wjc.35.1383157788599; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:29:48 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.217.49.73 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:29:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:79791 Archived-At: --047d7b86f172a86cf004e9f98425 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Forwarding from emacs-devel in order to get a bug number. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Alin Soare Date: Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 2:55 AM Subject: Small problem with "unmark" in *Buffer List* To: emacs-devel@gnu.org When I mark a buffer for saving (S marker in the 3rd column), the unmark does not clean the flag. This happens because the unmark does simply so: (tabulated-list-set-col 0 " " t) and the "S" marker is on the 3rd column, and it's not cleared. Now I discovered that in fact "Unmark" command should be called "unmark the deletion". Info page, 19.5 Operating on Several Buffers, quote: `u' Remove all flags from the current line, and move down (`Buffer-menu-unmark'). This is not true. Either press "g" to revert the buffer, or re-define "Buffer-menu-unmark" to really unmark the buffers. --047d7b86f172a86cf004e9f98425 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Forwarding from emacs-devel in order to get a bug number.<= br>
---------- Forwarded message ----------From: Alin Soare <= as1789@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 2:55 AM
Subject: Small problem with "unm= ark" in *Buffer List*
To: em= acs-devel@gnu.org


When I mark a buffer= for saving (S marker in the 3rd column), the unmark does not clean the fla= g.

=A0This happens because the unmark does simply so:

=A0 =A0 (tabulated-list-set-col 0 " " t)
and the "S" marker is on the 3rd column, and it's no= t cleared.

Now I discovered that in fact "Unm= ark" command should be called "unmark the deletion".

Info page, 19.5 Operating on Several Buffers, quote:

`u'
=A0 =A0 =A0Remove all flags f= rom the current line, and move down
=A0 =A0 =A0(`Buffer-menu-unma= rk').

This is not true. Either press "g" to r= evert the buffer, or re-define "Buffer-menu-unmark" to really unm= ark the buffers.




--047d7b86f172a86cf004e9f98425--