From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Carl =?UTF-8?Q?Winb=C3=A4ck?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37299: Observations regard bug #37299 Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 13:37:07 +0200 Message-ID: References: <8fybezmuflkli1.fsf@C02RR684G8WP.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="59977"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: 37299@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 31 17:38:54 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jJIyc-000FVt-GH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 17:38:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40483 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jJIyb-0007S5-Fa for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 11:38:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35341) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jJIws-0004AB-OP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 11:37:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jJIwq-0006sI-K3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 11:37:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53539) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jJIwq-0006rp-8D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 11:37:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jJIwq-0007ma-5V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 11:37:04 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <8fybezmuflkli1.fsf@C02RR684G8WP.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Resent-From: Carl =?UTF-8?Q?Winb=C3=A4ck?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 15:37:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37299 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 37299-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37299.158566900929839 (code B ref 37299); Tue, 31 Mar 2020 15:37:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37299) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Mar 2020 15:36:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36841 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jJIwa-0007l8-Uj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 11:36:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qk1-f180.google.com ([209.85.222.180]:36532) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jJFCu-0007WH-Lj for 37299@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 07:37:25 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qk1-f180.google.com with SMTP id d11so22568412qko.3 for <37299@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 04:37:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tunnel53-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+XQrI7cZz0LZjLQ5C3gCXqxzF7kzNBLpvkb+lOVS/Nk=; b=EiAAJMrIke16GDPp6Z3TOyXtNX3ot+77wK9ZkgCrxKk/94YgK7ruYsx22iJ3FTXbJP di94OtZ9H1hvWoIqqnfPzUJs0LsmFw9HFtb9WJj0Pv0Dh06PtxIZw4g49uQw0L4vmZRc DEIypuuj8ms7qjxL2xfVpqTtwr734waETvpJn75fDKmX2bDw8uopnrI4STG77oykpuIg 22P/vwAj8ZEbfF7XJA9HdYWz+V45dgTvz202Yelsn3fSGoKAIPFQD1GfIzeBZNacyaBt HkPz1pVob6+urxlip7fZz6I7a76PPMZU+8vdK1Cu2s8tCHRZQIiXjf0ZwUTJlV1XL5nD NkhQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+XQrI7cZz0LZjLQ5C3gCXqxzF7kzNBLpvkb+lOVS/Nk=; b=Nkhdp4PN5xAdZC6mluQ5hUNR2XtX7ngXpH8IzinQ1b99OxFZzMaST9a0DtmtANVxpS sCiP7EZ3z8nkIT5L1nxVk08eUagtWiZzv+cLpDeLSgQgNP9y77Q0a4vO7FykrUQuo+ls cbXNqiI+a/K9ODobWGrULj2fYh5qrAFFFtN0lIRR5zafoiHvcLds+nGnftLVFJPAN4BB BPECXhDox4hPpyyoCy1qMjGGEdg8/95jnyxxCPQI12pq7pNiT4kg9wmsP/QOnYe5X/zA VgWgUyIV7MijCDecLWfY//EKDBGphCYNEqt2ZjXJdyi0bS0LdX1U6UAQrITpUAEsn6jZ SPdQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3u1DEIBjb53Izzoe2b3r94aDVKv+A6lPfcHoUQiiTEqfKGdf0c UYqcX4ZI1fTT/BxUbYtFsM403dnqlotq3ivPIqPB6DY5K/I= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvjx2vLn2myb0XhL4cDumC6af+3WIh4QkvJok283gr412g2xbx7Tob1JCySiMwX41Rxc9o4ZlkQNsdthsK8/fI= X-Received: by 2002:a37:c41:: with SMTP id 62mr4314778qkm.342.1585654638751; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 04:37:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 11:36:47 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:177917 Archived-At: Hello friends, I was hit by this bug and have made some observations about it. The bug affects some, but not all, Emacs =E2=80=9Ddistributions=E2=80=9D fo= r macOS. These packages are affected by the bug: =E2=80=9DEmacs-26.3-universal.dmg= =E2=80=9D and =E2=80=9DEmacs-2020-03-26_01-40-23-fe6b8c91cb7a3c1959f7fb2b43f73cc7f7fc9fc3= -universal.dmg=E2=80=9D from https://emacsformacosx.com/ Another package that is also affected is =E2=80=9DEmacs-26.3-modified-2.dmg= =E2=80=9D, available at https://vigou3.gitlab.io/emacs-modified-macos/ However, I have also tried the package =E2=80=9Demacs-26.3-mac-7.9-10.14.4.zip=E2=80=9D. That package is *not* aff= ected by this bug. It=E2=80=99s available at https://github.com/railwaycat/homebrew-emacsmacport or via homebrew. The source itself seems to be available here: https://bitbucket.org/mituharu/emacs-mac/src/master/ So what conclusions can we draw from these facts? Apparently there are clues here that could help us to find the bug. According to the info in the file README-mac[1], that source distribution is modified quite heavily compared to =E2=80=9Dstock=E2=80=9D = Emacs. At this point I don=E2=80=99t know what it does differently when it comes to e.g. tramp mode or menu implementation. Is there anyone who would like to take a guess about why that package manage to avoid this bug? [1] https://bitbucket.org/mituharu/emacs-mac/src/master/README-mac