Agree about cl- being better than ecl- .
Btw, if remove-if becomes defalias'ed to cl-remove-if, aren't the two calls indistinguishable
to the byte compiler? If they are, and calling cl-remove wouldn't trigger a warning,
wouldn't remove-if calls also become warning-less? And if they would, isn't it simpler
to just allow calling remove-if? :)
ilya
> I'm just glad this is being considered :) It'd be great to see this inPatch welcome (and BTW, I'd prefer the "cl-" prefix over the "ecl-" prefix).
> 24.2 .
It's never too early to start.
Stefan