Agree about cl- being better than ecl- .

Btw, if remove-if becomes defalias'ed to cl-remove-if, aren't the two calls
indistinguishable
to the byte compiler?   If they are, and calling cl-remove wouldn't trigger
a warning,
wouldn't remove-if calls also become warning-less?   And if they would,
isn't it simpler
to just allow calling remove-if? :)

ilya

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>wrote:

> > I'm just glad this is being considered :)  It'd be great to see this in
> > 24.2 .
>
> Patch welcome (and BTW, I'd prefer the "cl-" prefix over the "ecl-"
> prefix).
> It's never too early to start.
>
>
>        Stefan
>