Right now, the cl package itself seems to violate the rule against calling its functions at runtime.
> Agree about cl- being better than ecl- .The name is different, so the compiler can definitely tell the difference.
> Btw, if remove-if becomes defalias'ed to cl-remove-if, aren't the two calls
> indistinguishable to the byte compiler?
Not necessarily, no.
> If they are, and calling cl-remove wouldn't trigger a warning,
> wouldn't remove-if calls also become warning-less?
Stefan