Re: Does anyone really use emacs in terminal?

[Steven Degutis <sbdegutis@gmail.com>]

But look at the bigger picture. There's no need to "emulate terminals"
anymore. The vast majority of computers aren't terminals and don't
have anything to do with real terminals. We're stuck in a circular
backwards-compatibility loop: we need terminal emulators because our
programs rely on them (less, cat, ssh, etc), and we write programs to
work on terminal emulators because that's all we have to run them on.

On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 12:34 AM, Pascal J. Bourguignon
<pjb@informatimago.com> wrote:
> Le Wang <l26wang@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> The cool kids do it.
>>
>> You can find many screencasts of people doing everything in terminal
>> and proselytising the simplicity and lack of distractions of such a
>> work flow.  They don't mention the lack of features, and the
>> pitfalls.
>>
>> As a result a lot of the newbie questions on stackoverflow and here
>> are "Why dozn't M-return work with me Emacs?" and "How comez when I
>> can't cut'n'paste from Emacs?".
>>
>> This is frustratingly detrimental to Emacs adoption because the new
>> user's initial experience with Emacs is "fixing" it.
>
>
> This has nothing to do with emacs, but all to do with lack of knowledge
> of said newbies about how terminals and computers work.  Direct them to
> the corresponding tutorials.
>
> Or direct them to emacs in GUI (X11, Cocoa, MS-Windows).
>
>
>
> Otherwise I wouldn't mind if somebody worked on the terminal protocol,
> notably on the keyboard part. (ECMA-048 is rich enough, for terminal
> output).
>
> I heard there are some extensions implemented in xterm to forward the
> status of more modifiers than just control.  Some standardization and
> wide adoption amongst terminal emulators at least (are physical
> terminals still produced?) should do the trick.
>
>
>
> --
> __Pascal Bourguignon__                     http://www.informatimago.com/
> A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}.
>
>