From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Vin Shelton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Fwd: 13 Test Failures Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:08:19 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87blih907u.fsf@gnus.org> <877dt5905t.fsf@gnus.org> <875z8p7eqf.fsf@gnus.org> <87wo155zg3.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003b816405aef545bc" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33204"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 10 15:09:30 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kGMKP-0008WR-VN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:09:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49698 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGMKP-0001fY-1p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:09:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59972) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGMJu-0001El-VQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:08:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ot1-f51.google.com ([209.85.210.51]:34512) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGMJs-0005HB-VX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:08:58 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ot1-f51.google.com with SMTP id h17so5303142otr.1 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 06:08:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EbdS6vb3J2QfRglvbP0zMUJ1ikseMlctRT18UDrkex4=; b=F8fizDkIjScUlGhxd6CUUyCNmxmp9WHIxG11oPjhRGntJnUQxijxxPo2y4zlOqa0Tj 5tiZBQdal/AL+sc5P7BXQ//xnp5ri6GgFdn5ipe5vzW6RzkDv4heSozXrYhFOpsF6MzY czBxTMuXgawYdyAsg022K1p3TPo0KA/qqRtxf4b6MjfzRjsvgIG5VQCyOSBl/5ekXuHh StrNghk+Pm7kwZYJR2PkkqJ6xL0/0a1H9dhcDqZOZl4AzBDyY44rN/nJzj0g4JgbniB7 pCKJ1/hyvS1VYeWOBWM7s3PNG03H762bWGRQCa8jzGqjcRu70puKQxNNSnAop8uH8ITM cIGg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5323fMCrmNSIYS+QHbk6bIcK7cq27VO9nFX4TU66l9nHZX3hP62C TEm+eWyllx+Lgdax8wG34zPxbsxpfVZw7KzZLR0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyIGy7Snkmn8elkDUI8h7i/uA+6qd+L0Ii/EtpF+q+Fu36bV/i69cy2hB6C/M6mEAn7N1fTAMx2y0AQlkS3CsI= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:eed:: with SMTP id 100mr3672788otj.20.1599743335298; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 06:08:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.210.51; envelope-from=ethersoft@gmail.com; helo=mail-ot1-f51.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/10 09:08:55 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:254993 Archived-At: --0000000000003b816405aef545bc Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks for the patch, Robert! To confirm: yes, your patch reduced the number of unexpected test results to zero on an in-tree build. - Vin On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 12:17 PM Robert Pluim wrote: > >>>>> On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 11:26:07 -0400, Vin Shelton < > acs@alumni.princeton.edu> said: > > Hi Vin! > > Vin> I am building on an Arch linux platform. I do not have mailutil= s > Vin> installed, nor do I have IPV6. > > Vin> With the latest sources, I see only one failure if I build in th= e > source > Vin> directory, vs. 11 failures for out-of-tree builds. I have > attached the > Vin> in-tree and out-of-tree test results. > > I guess you have a linux machine that really doesn=CA=BCt have an IPv6 > stack at all, right? Does this fix it for you? > > diff --git a/test/lisp/net/network-stream-tests.el > b/test/lisp/net/network-stream-tests.el > index c5d4bba889..1936b6fc5e 100644 > --- a/test/lisp/net/network-stream-tests.el > +++ b/test/lisp/net/network-stream-tests.el > @@ -418,7 +498,7 @@ connect-to-tls-ipv6-nowait > (while (and (eq (process-status proc) 'connect) > (< (setq times (1+ times)) 10)) > (sit-for 0.1)) > - (skip-unless (not (eq (process-status proc) 'connect)))) > + (skip-unless (eq (process-status proc) 'open)))) > (if (process-live-p server) (delete-process server))) > (setq status (gnutls-peer-status proc)) > (should (consp status)) > --0000000000003b816405aef545bc Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks for the patch, Robert!=C2=A0 To confi= rm: yes, your patch reduced the number of unexpected test results to zero o= n an in-tree build.

=C2=A0 - Vin=

On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 12:17 PM Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 8 Sep 2020= 11:26:07 -0400, Vin Shelton <acs@alumni.princeton.edu> said:

Hi Vin!

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Vin> I am building on an Arch linux platform.=C2=A0 I do n= ot have mailutils
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Vin> installed, nor do I have IPV6.

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Vin> With the latest sources, I see only one failure if I = build in the source
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Vin> directory, vs. 11 failures for out-of-tree builds.=C2= =A0 I have attached the
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Vin> in-tree and out-of-tree test results.

I guess you have a linux machine that really doesn=CA=BCt have an IPv6
stack at all, right? Does this fix it for you?

diff --git a/test/lisp/net/network-stream-tests.el b/test/lisp/net/network-= stream-tests.el
index c5d4bba889..1936b6fc5e 100644
--- a/test/lisp/net/network-stream-tests.el
+++ b/test/lisp/net/network-stream-tests.el
@@ -418,7 +498,7 @@ connect-to-tls-ipv6-nowait
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0(while (and (eq (process-status pr= oc) 'connect)
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0(< (setq times (1+ times)) 10))
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0(sit-for 0.1))
-=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 (skip-unless (not (eq (process-status p= roc) 'connect))))
+=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 (skip-unless (eq (process-status proc) = 'open))))
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0(if (process-live-p server) (delete-process serv= er)))
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0(setq status (gnutls-peer-status proc))
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0(should (consp status))
--0000000000003b816405aef545bc--