From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Carsten Mattner Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: C-g crash in C-x C-f (OSX Lion) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 21:42:05 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1323981743 32501 80.91.229.12 (15 Dec 2011 20:42:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 20:42:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jan.h.d@swipnet.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 15 21:42:19 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RbI8A-0008SO-Q2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 21:42:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34598 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RbI84-0001oe-BL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:42:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:50953) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RbI81-0001oO-7j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:42:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RbI80-0006bz-9p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:42:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-iy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.210.169]:53105) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RbI7y-0006bg-FS; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:42:06 -0500 Original-Received: by iacb35 with SMTP id b35so1828831iac.0 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 12:42:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lvp5AMl5JQE6X/peRQ0080G65FaKtNEHOB4cXuivW+E=; b=snLTzP9YHCCyzJil5ZCB6A2KhSmpWYJuWXvFKtgySPncdP4LMHnknAIZZCHu0OwZjj lZkAC2xp9O1ggmG1V1pyGmT5wLMo1edyZF6nBkKILaRRkwgZ9yWqaHSXxgQeslTH5wrs f6RYWXODst0Skx/7GSOKi/sGKe+5nFVvgcNJg= Original-Received: by 10.50.45.225 with SMTP id q1mr4160908igm.89.1323981725694; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 12:42:05 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.50.6.165 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 12:42:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.210.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:146729 Archived-At: On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 7:08 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 22:45:13 +0100 >> From: Carsten Mattner >> Cc: Emacs developers >> >> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Jan Dj=E4rv wrote: >> > Hello. >> > >> > I can't reproduce this either. =A0Can you reproduce this? =A0Does it h= appen with -Q? >> > Can you compile Emacs with debugging enabled and run Emacs in gdb? >> >> Quick instructions or link to instructions? >> Some undocumented ./configure option? > > Configure with > > =A0CFLAGS=3D'-O0 -ggdb -g3' ./configure --enable-asserts Thanks, will try to reproduce. What gdb commands are you interested in me running and saving the output of for posting to the list? Any specific Emacs threads I should look at. >> When I search for it, I only seem to find docs about using >> debuggers in emacs, not debugging emacs. > > See etc/DEBUG. =A0But I'm not sure this is what you are looking for. > Please elaborate what instructions you need. Yeah, something like that with info on how to "decode"/"interpret" pointers if required. >> Was the info from the OSX crash handler not useful at all? > > It is very hard to relate with the sources, since there's no source > line information there. Makes sense.