From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Carsten Mattner Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Memory again Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 14:26:19 +0100 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1322313990 22846 80.91.229.12 (26 Nov 2011 13:26:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 13:26:30 +0000 (UTC) To: Emacs developers Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 26 14:26:26 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RUIGu-00021Z-J7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 14:26:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32784 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RUIGu-00054P-1d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:26:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46934) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RUIGr-00054K-91 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:26:22 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RUIGq-0006sE-EC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:26:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-iy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.210.169]:42070) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RUIGq-0006sA-9a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:26:20 -0500 Original-Received: by iaek3 with SMTP id k3so7795908iae.0 for ; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 05:26:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=3ijC8g4ORPc8SEynZiV1m23VyZNb4jWAaW/uFeez43I=; b=PY2tcswCo5pGdFzlXoUFbt2xqHnuy8J1yr5GsNLYhck9iNd2I1DeSjxuMj0Cd90zmw Mq6yy+Jr983ztBYyZDWecYkXf9Y4znuuvHOMHA3LeO+4+KcZ/jbqjv2yfz45khjmH8Il yfdvS/9ffVzC/2JGMqcC0nMTs3AewVUS8lrFg= Original-Received: by 10.231.28.209 with SMTP id n17mr1025665ibc.89.1322313979295; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 05:26:19 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.50.190.167 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 05:26:19 -0800 (PST) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.210.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:146255 Archived-At: Hi list, after having stopped linking gnutls, I still seem to run into unfreed memory according to Activity Monitor on OSX Lion 10.7.2. After having used 4 erlang-mode buffers and having killed all buffers for more than an hour and having run M-x garbage-collect there still seems to be unreclaimable space. It's been sitting there with 0 buffers in *scratch* at around 54megs for a couple hours. It's of course possible some of that has lazily been allocated and won't be releases, but I'd be happy to confirm that it's not a leak somewhere. How should we go about analyzing this? Emacs.app build as follows: CC='gcc -arch i386' ./configure --with-ns --without-gnutls make bootstrap install